A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance

N/AActive Not RecruitingNCT05433051

Al-Azhar University24 enrolled

Overview

this study is to compare the dental and skeletal changes caused by the intrusion of maxillary first molars buccal miniscrew and TPA versus vertical holding appliance using lateral cephalometry.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Dental Intrusion Mandibular Rotation ANB , SNA, SNB Openbite Teeth &#X7C; Teeth and Gum &#X7C; Dental

Interventions

buccal miniscrew and TPABIOLOGICAL

intrusion of molars

vertical holding applianceBIOLOGICAL

intrusion of molars

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 14 YearsMax age: 20 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients suffering class I or II with AOB. * AOB ranged between 3-7 mm assessed from cephalometry. * Patients with excess in posterior dentoalveolar height according to Burrstone . * Patients with good oral hygiene and general health. * Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment. * Good quality of lateral cephalometry. Exclusion Criteria: * Skeletal open bite * previous orthodontic treatment

Locations (1)

Mohamed Shendy

Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

amount of dental

rate of maxillary molar intrusion by cephalometry

Time frame: Post-intervention at 6 months

amount of skeletal changes

amount of vertical overlap by cephalometry

Time frame: Post-intervention at 6 months

amount of skeletal changes

amount of mandibular rotation by cephalometry

Time frame: Post-intervention at 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.