Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and the sixth most prevalent cancer in the world. Standard treatments for early-stage HCCs include resection, liver transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, with 5-year survival rates of over 50 percent. Less than one-third of patients, however, are candidates for hepatic resection, and the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be significantly limited in cases with unfavorable tumor location and poor visibility on images, which increase the risk of technical failures and complications after RFA. Recent advancements in radiotherapy and imaging have made it possible to deliver optimal radiation doses on the tumor site while minimizing exposure to normal organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a method of high-precision radiation therapy that concentrates high-dose radiation to HCC in a short period of time to maximize the therapeutic effect on the tumor and minimize the side effects on normal tissues. Prospective and retrospective studies on SBRT for HCC have demonstrated its efficacy for local tumor control in small HCC. On the basis of these promising clinical results, a number of studies have compared the efficacy of RFA and SBRT. However, there is no strong evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing SBRT and RFA. In order to evaluate and compare the local efficacy and clinical outcomes of SBRT and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC, we conduct this non-inferiority trial.
A total of 178 subjects are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (89 patients in the body stereotactic radiotherapy group and 89 patients in the radiofrequency ablation group). If the assigned treatment method is technically infeasible, patients are allowed to be treated with the other method. * RFA: When localization of the lesion is difficult under image guidance, when it is difficult to secure a safe needle path, when there is a risk of collateral thermal damage to adjacent organs, and when it is difficult to prevent it. * SBRT: When irradiation with 45 Gy (daily dose of 15 Gy) is infeasible due to the maximum tolerance dose of normal organs.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
178
* Verify the setup position and respiration of patients as in the simulation CT image. * To precisely align the tumor prior to each treatment, cone-beam CT and gated fluoroscopy using the On-board Imager mounted on the linear accelerator are performed. * The Real-time Position Management system is used to monitor the accuracy of breathing phase during treatment.
\- RFA are performed under local anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care with either a 15-gause or 17-gause internally cooled electrode, depending on the size of the tumor.
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Local progression-free survival rate, per-protocol (PP)
Local progression-free survival rate, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Time frame: At year 2
Overall survival rate, ITT
Overall survival rate, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Progression-free survival rate, ITT
progression-free survival rate, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Adverse reaction rate, ITT
adverse reaction rate, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Time frame: At year 2
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Time frame: At year 2
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT
Time frame: At year 2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.