The changing food environment, with increasingly abundant ultra-processed food (UPF) options, may directly contribute to rising rates of obesity, though it is unknown which ingredients in UPF elevate their reinforcing nature in a way that may lead to overconsumption. The proposed study is the first to systematically examine differences in the rewarding characteristics of and physiological and metabolic responses to UPFs that are high in fat, refined carbohydrates (like sugar), or both. Understanding the biobehavioral underpinnings that enhance the reinforcing potential of ingredients in UPF (e.g., fat vs. refined carbohydrates) can inform novel intervention targets for the treatment of overeating and obesity.
The abundance of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in our environment has led to excessive calorie intake and been cited as perpetuating the obesity epidemic. UPFs do not exist in nature and are created to maximize palatability through the additions of fat, refined carbohydrates (RC), and/or sodium (e.g., chocolate, potato chips). Emerging research suggests UPFs may be reinforcing akin to rewarding substances like alcohol. However, empirical investigation of which ingredients in UPFs directly motivate overeating is in its nascent stages. This study will be the first to combine biological and behavioral methods used in addiction research with assessments of food reward, to delineate the mechanisms by which fat and RC drive UPF reinforcement and influence future consumption. Individuals (n=50) with obesity will be recruited for the current study. Participants will attend four appointments (order randomized/counterbalanced) and will consume a snack consisting of 1) UPF high in fat + RC (UPF+FRC), 2) UPF high in fat (UPF+F), 3) UPF high in RC (UPF+RC), or 4) minimally processed foods (MPF). At each assessment, subjective experiences and metabolic responses will be assessed before and up to 120 minutes after consumption of each snack. An ad-libitum eating period for each food condition will follow to evaluate associations of metabolic/behavioral responses with subsequent intake. For five days after each appointment, participants will use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess subjective experiences and real-world reported consumption of UPF+FRC, UPF+F, UPF+RC, and MPF.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
All participants will attend four food consumption assessment visits where, at each visit, they will be asked to consume a standardized snack portion of: 1) ultra-processed foods (UPFs) high in both fat and refined carbohydrates (UPF+FRC), 2) UPF high in fat (UPF+F), 3) UPF high in refined carbohydrates (white flour, sugar) (UPF+RC), or 4) minimally processed foods. The order of the four food consumption assessment visits will be randomized and counterbalanced across participants, who will each consume all the test snacks across the four appointments.
Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGSubjective reward responses to food intake (in lab)
Indicators of subjective reward (craving, palatability, hedonic hunger, and mood) will be assessed by participants' self-reports before, during, and after consumption of the test snack at each of the four food consumption appointments. Each facet of subjective reward will be assessed by 100-point visual analog scales ranging from 0-100.
Time frame: 10 minutes before intake of test snack, during, and 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120 minutes after intake of the test snack.
Subjective reward responses to food intake (EMA)
Indicators of subjective reward (craving, palatability, hedonic hunger, and mood) will be assessed by participants' self-reports in EMA surveys. Each facet of subjective reward will be assessed by 100-point visual analog scales ranging from 0-100.
Time frame: EMA surveys administered over 5 days following each food consumption assessment (20 total days of EMA data)
Ad libitum consumption
Total number of calories consumed from the test snack food during a 15-minute eating period. Calories will calculated by measuring bowls containing the test snacks before and after participant consumption on a digital scale accurate to 0.01 grams. The difference in grams will be converted into the calories that the participant ate.
Time frame: 2 hours after test snack intake at each food consumption assessment.
Daily calorie intake (EMA)
Calorie intake will be derived from participants' self-reported food consumption in EMA surveys.
Time frame: EMA surveys administered over 5 days following each food consumption assessment (20 total days of EMA data)
Consumption of UPFs and MPFs (EMA)
Trained study staff will calculate the percentage of participants' daily calories from the four food categories (UPF+FRC, UPF+F, UPF+RC, MPF) based on participants' self-reported food consumption in EMA surveys.
Time frame: EMA surveys administered over 5 days following each food consumption assessment (20 total days of EMA data)
Changes in heart rate in response to food intake
Manually measured by counting the radial pulse for 15 seconds (timed using a digital stopwatch).
Time frame: 10 minutes before intake of test snack, during, and 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120 minutes after intake of the test snack.
Salivation responses to food intake
Participants will spit into a plastic cup for 1 minute and the weight of their saliva will be measured in grams using a digital food scale accurate to 0.01 grams.
Time frame: 10 minutes before intake of test snack, during, and 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120 minutes after intake of the test snack.
Magnitude of metabolic responses to food intake
Serial blood draws will be conducted before, during, and after test snack consumption. Samples will be assayed for glucose, insulin, ghrelin, and leptin levels.
Time frame: 10 minutes before intake of test snack, during, and 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120 minutes after intake of the test snack.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.