Severe to profound hearing loss affects 0,8% of the global population. For these people, a conventional hearing aid often does not provide sufficient benefit. However, these people can benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). A CI needs to be individually programmed (fitted) for each recipient. A fitting "map" is defined as a set of electrical parameters that are individually adapted to a recipient's needs to achieve optimal sound perception. At present, most CI recipients are fitted with a default frequency allocation map that doesn't take individual variability in size and shape of the cochlea into account. In this study, a fitting strategy based on the post-operative CT scan, that will allow the audiologist to set a frequency-band distribution for CI fitting that may be more closely aligned to the natural tonotopic frequency distribution of a normal hearing cochlea, will be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
Programming of cochlear implant speech processor according to standard clinical care
Programming of cochlear implant speech processor with anatomy-based fitting
UZ Brussel
Brussels, Belgium
RECRUITINGSpeech recognition test in quiet (S0): percentage correctly identified phonemes
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Speech recognition test in quiet (S0): percentage correctly identified phonemes
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Speech recognition test in noise (S0N0): the speech reception threshold in dB SNR
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Speech recognition test in noise (S0N0): the speech reception threshold in dB SNR
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Result of the pitch matching test: frequency difference in semitones
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Result of the pitch matching test: frequency differences in semitones
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Result of the perception of timbre test: Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Patients have to rate the timbre on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where a higher score reflects a better outcome.
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Result of the perception of timbre test: Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Patients have to rate the timbre on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where a higher score reflects a better outcome.
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Result of the consonance and dissonance rating test: Plot of pleasantness over frequency interval and modulation measure
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Result of the consonance and dissonance rating test: Plot of pleasantness over frequency interval and modulation measure
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Result of the speech contrast discrimination test: Psychometric function of phoneme categorization
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Result of the speech contrast discrimination test: Psychometric function of phoneme categorization
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Patient reported outcome- Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI): Total score and classification of self-perceived auditory benefit
Time frame: 1 day visit (At the activation of the sound processor)
Patient reported outcome- Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI): Total score and classification of self-perceived auditory benefit
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Patient reported outcome- Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI): Total score and classification of self-perceived auditory benefit
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
Datalogging data: Average numbers of hours per day
Time frame: 2 weeks post-activation
Datalogging data: Average numbers of hours per day
Time frame: 1 months post-activation
Datalogging data: Average numbers of hours per day
Time frame: 3 months post-activation
Datalogging data: Average numbers of hours per day
Time frame: 6 months post-activation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.