Several randomized studies have demonstrated the efficiency of lung cancer screening (LCS) on mortality rates. However, screening efficiency is related to the targeted population and the participation rate. In France, the participation rate for breast and colon cancer screening programs is respectively 50% and 32%, which is low. Then, it appears very important to determine which factors are influencing the willingness to participate to these programs. Indeed, it will allow a better communication and we will be able to perform screening campaigns adapted to the eligible population. The Lyon Hospital is the second university hospital in France. It is composed of 14 buildings and employed 23 000 persons. More than 160 occupations are represented. So, hospital employees look relevant to be studied for LCS program. ILYAD was divided in 2 parts. The first one was completed in 2020 and goal to evaluate the number of eligible individuals among the hospital employees. About 800 persons would be eligible for LCS. This second part of the study will evaluate the participation rate and the feasibility of the LCS program. The study will target the 800 individuals that were identified previously.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
600
3 levels of solicitation will be cumulated. First : a Simple collective solicitation of all staff via internal media 4 months later : Personalized indirect solicitation of at-risk groups with information posted in identified areas 4 months later : Personalized direct solicitation of at-risk groups
* spirometry examination * Questionnaires * Blood samples and breath samples to find biomarkers
Hôpital L. Pradel
Bron, France
RECRUITINGHôpital de la Croix Rousse - Department of Pneumology
Lyon, France
RECRUITINGCentre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, France
RECRUITINGParticipation rate at baseline
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent a CT scan at baseline and the estimated number of eligible employees
Time frame: At the baseline visit
Participation rate according to the 3 communication levels.
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent the baseline CT scan at level 1, 2 and 3 and the estimated number of eligible employees
Time frame: At 4 month = level 1 ; At 8 month = level 2 ; At 12 month = level 3
Identification of predictive factors for participation decision
Using the cox model to identify sociodemographic factors that could be associated with the participation rates for both round of CT scan.
Time frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluation of feasibility of the LCS program by measuring the proportion of individuals having undergo all the required exams and evaluations according to the results of the CT scan, conformity of the scan interpretation, and adverse event monitoring.
Ratio between individuals who completed baseline and year 1 CT scan and the number of participants. And, the ratio of individuals who beneficiated conform care according to French recommendations.
Time frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluation of screening efficiency according to the proportion of lung cancer, ILD, COPD diagnosed and the percentage of smoking cessation among the active smokers.
Ratio of lung cancer diagnosed Ration of ILD diagnosed Ratio of COPD diagnosed Ratio of smoking cessation
Time frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluate the participation rate at 1 year and identify the factors that trigger it.
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent the Year 1 CT scan and the number of participants.
Time frame: At 1Year follow-up
Identification of efficient biomarker for LC screening
Perform blood analysis to identify specific biomarkers and compare their sensibility, and predictive value with or without association with the CT scan.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluation of the efficiency of VOC for LC screening
Perform air breath analysis to identify specific chemical species, compare their sensibility, and predictive value associated, and not with the CT scan.
Time frame: At baseline
Evaluate the follow up to the french guidelines
Ratio between the participant at the cohort and who have done the scanner 2 years post Year1 one, and the participant at the cohort.
Time frame: Follow up after the 1 year visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.