The main aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of lanadelumab in Chinese participants with HAE. Participants will be treated with lanadelumab for 26 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Lanadelumab subcutaneous injection
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
Yantai, Shandong, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, China
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
TEAE is defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset at the time of or following initial dosing with study drug (lanadelumab), or medical conditions present prior to the start of study drug but increasing in severity or relationship at the time of or following the start of treatment, up to the last follow-up visit. An SAE is any untoward clinical manifestation of signs, symptoms or outcomes whether considered related to investigational product or not and at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. Hypersensitivity reactions and events of disordered coagulation were considered as AESIs. Adverse events were classified as HAE attack and non-HAE attack reported AEs and are categorized accordingly in this outcome measure. A participant could be counted in more than one category.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to Day 210)
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters
Laboratory parameters included clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, and serology. Clinically meaningful laboratory parameters assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters (including clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, and serology) were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to Day 210)
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital signs included measurement of blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and respiratory rate. Clinically meaningful vital signs assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes in vital signs were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to Day 210)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECG included heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc) interval, QT corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's cube root formula (QTcF) interval, and QT corrected for heart rate by Bazett formula (QTcB) interval. Clinically meaningful ECG assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes in ECG were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to Day 210)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities on Day 182
Physical examination findings by body system were classified as height and weight, general appearance, ears, nose and throat, head and neck, ophthalmological, respiratory, cardiovascular, abdomen, neurological, extremities, dermatological, and lymphatic. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in physical examination findings per investigator interpretation were reported. Only categories with at least one participant with event are reported.
Time frame: Day 182
Plasma Concentrations of Lanadelumab
Time frame: Anytime on Days 0 and 210; and pre-dose on Days 14, 56, 98, 140, 182
Plasma Kallikrein (pKal) Activity
pKal activity was measured by cleaved high molecular weight kininogen (cHMWK) level (i.e., plasma concentrations of cHMWK).
Time frame: Anytime on Days 0 and 210; and pre-dose on Days 14, 56, 98, 140, 182
Number of Investigator-Confirmed HAE Attacks During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
An HAE attack was confirmed by following symptoms or signs consistent with an attack in at least one of the following locations: 1) Peripheral angioedema: cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region; 2) Abdominal angioedema: abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea; 3) Laryngeal angioedema: stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx. Treatment period attack rate per month is calculated as the number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks occurring during that treatment period divided by number of days the participant contributed to that treatment period multiplied by 28 days.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Investigator-Confirmed HAE Attacks That Required Acute Treatment During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
An HAE attack was confirmed by following symptoms/signs consistent with an attack in atleast one of the following locations:1)Peripheral angioedema:cutaneous swelling involving an extremity,the face,neck,torso,and/or genitourinary region;2)Abdominal angioedema:abdominal pain,with/without abdominal distention,nausea,vomiting,or diarrhea;3)Laryngeal angioedema:stridor,dyspnea, difficulty speaking,difficulty swallowing,throat tightening,or swelling of the tongue,palate,uvula,or larynx.Acute HAE attacks were managed per the investigator's usual care, including use of individualized acute therapy/rescue medications.Acute therapy/rescue medications included Firazyr, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), or other local standard of care.Treatment period attack rate per month is calculated as the number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks requiring acute treatment occurring during that treatment period divided by number of days the participant contributed to that treatment period multiplied by 28 days.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Moderate or Severe Investigator-Confirmed HAE Attacks During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
The severity of the investigator-confirmed HAE attacks was defined per the HAE attack assessment and reporting procedures (HAARP) definitions: severe (marked limitation in activity, assistance required), moderate (mild to moderate limitation in activity, some assistance needed). Treatment period attack rate per month is calculated as the number of moderate or severe investigator-confirmed HAE attacks occurring during that treatment period divided by number of days the participant contributed to that treatment period multiplied by 28 days.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Participants With Maximum Attack Severity During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
Number of participants with maximum HAE attack severity during the efficacy evaluation period was assessed. HAE attack severity was calculated per participant based on the severity categories as follows: No attack, Mild, Moderate, and Severe.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Time to First Investigator-confirmed HAE Attack During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
Time to the first investigator-confirmed HAE attack (days) was calculated from the date and time of the first dose of study drug for that efficacy evaluation period to the date and time of the first investigator-confirmed HAE attack after the first dose for the efficacy evaluation period. The time to the first HAE attack was summarized using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Participants Who Achieved Investigator-confirmed HAE Attack-Free Status During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
An HAE attack was confirmed by following symptoms or signs consistent with an attack in at least one of the following locations: 1) Peripheral angioedema: cutaneous swelling involving an extremity, the face, neck, torso, and/or genitourinary region; 2) Abdominal angioedema: abdominal pain, with or without abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea; 3) Laryngeal angioedema: stridor, dyspnea, difficulty speaking, difficulty swallowing, throat tightening, or swelling of the tongue, palate, uvula, or larynx. A participant was considered as attack free if the participant had no investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during the efficacy evaluation period. Number of participants who achieved attack-free status for the efficacy evaluation periods were assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100% Reduction in the Investigator-Confirmed Normalized Number of Attacks (NNA) Per 4 Weeks Relative to the Run-in Period NNA
A run-in period of 4 weeks was included to determine the participant's baseline attack rate. This period may be extended up to 8 weeks. The normalized number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during efficacy evaluation period was expressed as a monthly (28 days) HAE attack rate relative to the run-in period NNA. Number of participants who achieved at least 50 percent (%), 70%, 90% and 100% reduction in the investigator-confirmed NNA per 4 weeks relative to the run-in period normalized NNA for the efficacy evaluation periods was assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Participants Who Achieved NNA <1.0 Per 4 Weeks for the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
The normalized number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during the efficacy evaluation period was expressed as a monthly (28 days) HAE attack rate. Attack rate was calculated for each participant as the number of attacks occurring during the specified period divided by the number of days the participant contributed to the specified period multiplied by 28 days. Number of participants who achieved NNA \<1.0 per 4 weeks for the efficacy evaluation period were assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182
Number of Participants With Neutralizing or Non-neutralizing Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) in Plasma
Number of participants with neutralizing or non-neutralizing ADA in plasma were assessed.
Time frame: Anytime on Days 0 and 210; and pre-dose on Days 56, 98, 140, 182
Plasma Concentrations of Lanadelumab by Immunogenicity Result
The effect of presence or absence of neutralizing or non-neutralizing ADA in plasma on the lanadelumab plasma concentrations was assessed.
Time frame: Anytime on Days 0 and 210; and pre-dose on Days 56, 98, 140, 182
Plasma Kallikrein Activity cHMWK by Immunogenicity Result
The effect of presence or absence of neutralizing or non-neutralizing ADA in plasma on the cHMWK levels was assessed.
Time frame: Anytime on Days 0 and 210; and pre-dose on Days 56, 98, 140, 182
Number of Investigator-confirmed HAE Attacks by Immunogenicity Result During the Efficacy Evaluation Period of Day 0 Through Day 182
The number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during the efficacy evaluation period was expressed as a normalized monthly (4 weeks, i.e., 28 days). Treatment period attack rate per month is calculated as the number of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks occurring during that treatment period divided by number of days the participant contributed to that treatment period multiplied by 28 days. The effect of presence or absence of neutralizing or non-neutralizing ADA in plasma on the investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during the efficacy evaluation period was assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 through Day 182