Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions in distance runners. 44% of patients still had the symptoms after 15 years from the first onset. The chronicity of the condition may lead to significant limitations on daily activities and even cessation of running. In the concept of foot core system, the intrinsic foot muscles work together with plantar fascia to stabilize the foot arches and provide dynamic support to the foot during functional activities. Given that the intrinsic foot muscles also play an important role as a direct sensors of foot deformation, postural control may be compromised during pathological state. Therefore, this study aim to investigate the differences in the muscle thickness and cross-sectional area of intrinsic foot muscles and postural control in runners with and without plantar fasciitis. We hypothesized that runners with plantar fasciitis demonstrate small intrinsic foot muscles sizes and poor postural control when compared with the asymptomatic counterparts.
this is a case-control study, using ultrasound imaging (USG) to examine the differences in muscle thickness (MT) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of Abductor Hallucis (AbH), flexor hallucis brevis (FHB), flexor digitorum brevis (FDB), and quadratus plantae (QP), and postural control in runners with and without plantar fasciitis. All participants were recruited through recruitment flyers and word of mouth from local running community. The dependent variables included navicular height using navicular drop test, foot posture using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI-6). The actual status of symptoms was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) pain at the first steps in the morning, VAS pain at worst of the day, the Foot Function Index Revised short form (FFI-R S), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The postural control was assessed by three 10-seconds eyes opened trials and three 10-seconds eyes closed trials single-leg stance recorded on an instrumented force platform . (AMTI. Watertown, MA) at 50 Hz. Center of pressure velocity (cm/s) was calculated for each condition using Balance Clinic software (AMTI. Watertown, MA). In addition, percent modulation was calculated using equation 1 to provide an estimate of a participant's reliance on visual information for the postural control of intrinsic foot muscles. Equation 1 is as followed. % modulation= (eyes open velocity-eyes closed velocity)/(eyes open velocity) Larger negative values represent a greater impairment to postural control when vision is removed and suggest a greater reliance on visual information.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
64
CUHK-ORT Sports Injury Research Laboratory
Shatin, Hong Kong
RECRUITINGMuscle thickness (MT) of Abductor Hallucis (AbH), Flexor Hallucis Brevis (FHB), Flexor Digitorum Brevis (FDB), Quadratus Plantae (QP)
ultrasound measurement
Time frame: baseline
Cross sectional area (CSA) of Abductor Hallucis (AbH), Flexor Hallucis Brevis (FHB), Flexor Digitorum Brevis (FDB), Quadratus Plantae (QP)
ultrasound measurement
Time frame: baseline
postural control
three 10-seconds eyes opened trials and three 10-seconds eyes closed trials single-leg stance recorded on an instrumented force platform. percent modulation was calculated using equation 1 to provide an estimate of a participant's reliance on visual information for the postural control of intrinsic foot muscles. Equation 1 is as followed. % modulation= (eyes open velocity-eyes closed velocity)/(eyes open velocity) Larger negative values represent a greater impairment to postural control when vision is removed and suggest a greater reliance on visual information.
Time frame: baseline
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain at first steps in the morning
measuring 100 mm in length marked from 0 (absence of pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain)
Time frame: baseline
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) worst pain of the day
measuring 100 mm in length marked from 0 (absence of pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain)
Time frame: baseline
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Higher scores represent higher levels of function, with 100% representing no dysfunction.
Time frame: baseline
Foot Function Index revised short form (FFI-RS)
grade 1 corresponds to no pain and 4 corresponds to worst pain imaginable. The numerical 5 is not used as a score but is used to indicate that the subscale question is not applicable for the participant. Higher scores represent higher levels of pain, stiffness, difficulty, activity limitation, and psychosocial aspect
Time frame: baseline
Foot posture index (FPI)
Pronated postures are given a positive value, the higher the value the more pronated.
Time frame: Baseline
Navicular drop
Supinated foot (\<5mm); Neutral foot (5-9mm); pronated foot (\>9mm)
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.