The novel Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is found to be safe and effective in performing LAAO procedure. However, the procedural outcomes have not been compared with the traditional non-steerable fixed curve sheath. In this study investigators aim to compare the outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath versus a novel steerable sheath.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. It is one of the strongest risk factors of systemic thromboembolism (TE), with stroke being the most serious outcome. Prevention of stroke is the cornerstone of managing AF, which can be achieved either by oral anticoagulation (OAC) or Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients who have a contraindication to OAC. Heterogeneity in cardiac chamber size, interatrial septum, LAA anatomy and orientation, operator experience and currently available fixed curve sheaths add to the complexity of the procedure. Alignment of LAAO device along the access of the left atrial appendage body is an important factor in improving closure rates. The devices which are currently approved by FDA for LAA closure in the U.S. are Amplatzer Amulet device (Abbott Medical) and Watchman and Watchman FLX devices (Boston Scientific). In a recent study, Amplatzer Amulet device was found to be noninferior in terms of safety and effectiveness, with superior LAA occlusion rates but higher device-related complications as compared to first generation watchman device. The LAAO device sheaths that are used currently have fixed shapes and angles that may not be optimal for some LAA anatomy, which can lead to excessive device manipulation, prolonged procedure time, and potentially suboptimal co-axiality during the process. This may lead to increase device related complications. The new Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is designed to provide distal bidirectional steerability of the sheath for Amulet implantation. Such steerability may enable successful endovascular closure of greater proportion of LAA, allow precise position of the transseptal puncture, and potentially reduce procedural times and complications with complex cases. Investigators hypothesize that the use of novel steerable sheath for LAAO closure is safer and more effective as compared to non-steerable fixed curve sheath
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.
Menorah Medical Center
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Overland Park Regional Medical Center
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Centerpoint Medical Center Clinic
Independence, Missouri, United States
Number of participants with Acute Closure of Left Atrial Appendage
Acute closure ( less than or equal to 3mm) of the left atrial appendage after Left Atrial Appedage Occlusion(LAAO) procedure
Time frame: 1 day
Number of patients with Cardiac Perforation
Number of patients with cardiac perforation
Time frame: 7 days
Need for Pericardiocentesis
Need for pericardiocentesis within 7 days of implantation
Time frame: 7 days
Number of devices
Number of devices changed prior to final implant during the procedure
Time frame: 1 day (procedure day)
Number of device repositions
Number of device repositions performed during the procedure
Time frame: 1 day (procedure day)
Closure Rates
45 day closure rates of left atrial appendage ( less than or equal to 3mm)
Time frame: 45 days
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Time frame: 45 days
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
300
Centerpoint Medical Center
Independence, Missouri, United States
Research Medical Center Clinic
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Research Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Time frame: 6 months