Objective/Hypotheses and Specific Aims: The first aim of this proposal is to determine the effects of commercial prosthetic feet of varying stiffness on stability and falls-related outcomes in Veterans with TTA. The second aim is to determine whether a PFE can be used to predict stability and balance-confidence outcomes with corresponding commercial prosthetic feet. The third and final aim is to determine whether a brief trial of commercial prosthetic feet can predict longer-term stability and balance-confidence outcomes in Veterans with TTA. Study Design: The investigators will use a participant blinded cross-over study with repeated measurements in Veterans and Service members with TTA. Up to 50 participants will be enrolled at each of the two study sites VA Puget Sound and VA Minneapolis. Participants will complete up to 6 visits. After an initial assessment visit, participants will be assigned to the 'high' or 'low' mobility group, and then during visit 2 they will be randomized to use the PFE in three foot modes or the three corresponding actual (commercially available) feet during walking tests on difference surfaces in the laboratory (cross-slopes, inclines, even, and uneven ground). During visit 3 participants will repeat the procedures in the other condition (e.g., PFE if visit 2 included actual feet testing). At the end of visit 3 participants will be fit with one of the actual feet and wear it at home and in the community for approximately one week. At visit 4 participants will be fit with the next actual foot and repeat the 1 week use window. The same process will be followed for the final foot at visit 5, and the study foot will be returned at visit 6.
Using a prosthesis allows many who experience lower leg amputation to regain functional abilities, but walking may be more difficult, and people with limb loss suffer from a wide range of mobility limitations including balance and stability impairments. Selecting an optimal prosthetic foot is an important aspect of maximizing mobility, limiting falls, and the achievement of functional goals for people with lower leg amputation (LLA), however there is limited evidence to guide this process. The current prosthetic prescription process relies on clinician experience and typically does not allow people with a leg amputation to easily try out different prosthetic feet. The investigators have developed a customizable robotic prosthetic foot that can mimic the mechanical properties of commercially available prosthetic feet in the coronal and sagittal planes without physically changing feet. This multiaxial 'prosthetic foot emulator' (PFE) can be attached to the prescribed prosthetic socket and worn like a regular prosthetic foot within the laboratory or clinic, providing people with LLA the opportunity to quickly 'test-drive' many prosthetic foot designs within a single test session. Trial and error with actual commercial prosthetic feet can be inefficient given the time and expense required for the purchasing and fitting of prosthetic feet. The PFE could provide a means to explore a range of feet over uneven, incline, and cross sloped surfaces in a very short period of time. This study aims to optimize stability and balance-related outcomes, to minimize falls, and to optimize vocational and avocational participation and functional quality for life for Veterans with LLA. This study will determine the effects of coronal and sagittal plane commercially-available prosthetic foot stiffness on stability and falls related outcomes and will evaluate the use of a test-drive strategy using a PFE to predict stability and balance-confidence outcomes with corresponding commercial prosthetic feet. Results from this study may contribute to increased understanding of how a patient-centered strategy for optimizing prosthetic prescription can improve patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and balance confidence for Veterans and others with LLA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
100
Participants will walk in the laboratory with the multiaxial Prosthetic Foot Emulator (PFE) in three foot modes corresponding to commercial prosthetic study feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected comfortable, slow, and fast speeds, inclines, cross slopes, and uneven terrain.
Participants will walk in the laboratory with the commercial prosthetic study feet in three foot modes corresponding to commercial prosthetic study feet. Walking conditions will include self-selected comfortable, slow, and fast speeds, inclines, cross slopes, and uneven terrain. Additionally, participants will be fit with one of the commercial prosthetic study feet and wear it at home and in the community for approximately one week. Participants will return to the laboratory to follow-up testing, and will complete the community trial with each of the three commercial prosthetic study feet.
Minneapolis VA Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGVA Puget Sound Health Care System
Seattle, Washington, United States
RECRUITINGSelf-report: perceived stability
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and perceived stability during walking on uneven ground and cross-slopes
Time frame: Administered at baseline and during follow up testing with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Biomechanical measures: Medial/Lateral Margin of Stability (MOS)
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Medial/Lateral Margin of Stability (MOS) during walking on uneven ground and cross-slopes
Time frame: Administered during follow up testing with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Performance-based outcomes: Narrowing Beam Walking Test
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Narrowing Beam Walking Test score.
Time frame: Administered at baseline with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Performance-based outcomes: Narrowing Beam Walking Test
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Narrowing Beam Walking Test score.
Time frame: Administered during follow up testing with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Performance-based outcomes: Four Square Step Test
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Four Square Step Test score.
Time frame: Administered at baseline with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Performance-based outcomes: Four Square Step Test
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Four Square Step Test score.
Time frame: Administered during follow up testing with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Self-report: balance confidence Activities-specific Balance Confidence
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) score
Time frame: Administered at baseline with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Self-report: Activity Restriction PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Time frame: Administered at baseline with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Self-report: Activity Restriction PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Correlation between prosthetic foot sagittal and coronal plane stiffness properties and PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APSRA)
Time frame: Administered during follow up testing with the commercial feet (approximately 2 hours)
Self-report: perceived stability with emulated feet and commercial feet
Correlation between participants self-report perceived stability using the multiaxial prosthetic foot emulator and the commercial prosthetic study feet
Time frame: Administered during initial testing with emulated and actual prosthetic feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: perceived stability with emulated feet and balance confidence using corresponding commercial feet
Correlation between participants self-report perceived stability using the multiaxial prosthetic foot emulator during initial testing and their balance confidence using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered during initial testing with emulated feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: perceived stability with emulated feet and balance confidence using corresponding commercial feet
Correlation between participants self-report perceived stability using the multiaxial prosthetic foot emulator during initial testing and their balance confidence using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered at follow up using the actual prosthetic feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: perceived stability with emulated feet and performance-based measures of stability (NBWT and FSST) using corresponding commercial feet
Correlation between participants self-report perceived stability using the multiaxial prosthetic foot emulator during initial testing and their performance-based stability using the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT) and Four Square Step Test (FSST) during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered during initial testing with emulated feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: perceived stability with emulated feet and performance-based measures of stability (NBWT and FSST) using corresponding commercial feet
Correlation between participants self-report perceived stability using the multiaxial prosthetic foot emulator during initial testing and their performance-based stability using the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT) and Four Square Step Test (FSST) during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered at follow up using the actual prosthetic feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: initial perceived stability and follow-up perceived stability
Correlation between initial perceived stability with each actual foot (relative to other feet) and perceived stability with the corresponding foot at follow-up
Time frame: Administered during initial testing with the actual feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: initial perceived stability and follow-up perceived stability
Correlation between initial perceived stability with each actual foot (relative to other feet) and perceived stability with the corresponding foot at follow-up
Time frame: Administered at follow up using the actual prosthetic feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: initial perceived stability and follow-up performance-based based measures of stability
Correlation between initial perceived stability with each actual foot (relative to other feet) and performance-based stability using the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT) and Four Square Step Test (FSST) during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered during initial testing with actual feet (approximately two hours)
Self-report: initial perceived stability and follow-up performance-based based measures of stability
Correlation between initial perceived stability with each actual foot (relative to other feet) and performance-based stability using the Narrowing Beam Walking Test (NBWT) and Four Square Step Test (FSST) during follow up with the corresponding commercial prosthetic foot
Time frame: Administered at follow up using the actual prosthetic feet (approximately two hours)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.