Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease, which is characterized by the increase of immunoglobulin G (IgG) level, the presence of auto-antibodies and a typical histology, in the absence of other liver disease. Due to the heterogeneity of AIH manifestations, different scoring systems have been validated in order to make a reliable diagnosis. The two most recent scoring systems are: the revised International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) criteria and the IAIHG simplified criteria. The second one is recommended by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The EASL clinical practice guidelines suggests that the treatment of ASAIH (Acute Severe AIH) is high doses of corticosteroids (superior to 1mg/kg/day) as early as possible and a lack of improvement within seven days should lead to listing for emergency liver transplantation (LT). However, the "lack of improvement" is not objectively defined and the grading of recommendation is III (Opinions of respected authorities). The hypothesis of the study is that the previously developed decisional score on a retrospective series will prospectively allow the differentiation between patients with ASAIH (Acute Severe AIH) who respond to corticosteroid therapy and should be maintained on treatment and patients who do not respond and should be rapidly evaluated for LT. The score will be computed at day 3 since corticosteroid introduction.
All the interventions (blood samples, imagery examinations, visits, liver biopsy, corticosteroid therapy, liver transplantation) will be performed following the standard of care for ASAIH. The investigators of the participating centers will not change their standard management for the study protocol. The management will follow the recommendation of EASL CPGs. The prognostic score will allow to distinguish between patient's responders and non-responders to corticosteroid therapy in ASAIH. This knowledge will avoid the prolonged duration of the corticosteroid therapy in patients for whom this therapy is futile or harmful and rapidly select the patients for LT. Of course considering that the created score is decisional whether a patient is a candidate for LT, a prospective validation is mandatory to use it as a clinical tool for the day-to-day practice. This is the first prospective study on ASAIH.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Administration of high doses of corticosteroids as early as possible. Patient non-responder to treatment should lead to listing for emergency liver transplantation (LT).
CHU Angers, Service Hepato-gastro-enterologie
Angers, France
CHU Jean Minjoz Besançon, Service d'hepatologie et de soins intensifs digestifs
Besançon, France
APHP, Hopital Avicenne, Service Hepatologie et Oncologie Hépatique
Bobigny, France
CHU Brest, Hopital de la Cavale Blanche Service Gastro-enterologie
Brest, France
CHU de Caen, Hopital de la Cote de Nacre, Service Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie et Nutrition
Caen, France
Prospectively validate the previously elaborated SURFASA-score, evaluating its ability to predict non-response outcome to corticosteroid therapy in a new population of patients with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis.
Patient response within 90 days to corticosteroid therapy defined as: responders (alive without LT) or non-responders (dead or transplanted) within 90 days since corticosteroid therapy introduction.
Time frame: Day 90
The association between infection occurrence and death during hospitalization
Documented infections during hospitalization
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
the management of infected ASAIH patients in usual practice
Antibiotic therapy : doses
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
The risk factors for early AIH flair after corticosteroid therapy response.
The frequency of AIH flair
Time frame: D90
The risk factors for AIH recurrence after liver transplantation
AIH recurrence
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
The evolution of patients after LT
Retransplantation, alive, death
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
The evolution of patients not treated with corticosteroids but meeting the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria
Retransplantation, alive, death
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
The prognostic factors for survival in patients treated with corticosteroids who underwent or not LT
quality of the graft, immunosuppression, rejection episode,
Time frame: participation period (treatment+follow-up): 12 months
The association of histological features (liver biopsy) with response to corticosteroids and survival at 90 days since admission
Presence of centrilobular necrosis and inflammatory infiltration
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU Trousseau Chambray, Service Gastro-enterologie et hepatologie
Chambray-lès-Tours, France
CHU Dijon, Service Hepato-gastroenterologie et cancerologie digestive
Dijon, France
CHRU de Lille, Hopital Claude Huriez, Service des maladies de l'appareil digestif et de la nutrition
Lille, France
CHU Limoges, Hopital Dupuytren, Service Hepato-gastroenterologie et nutrition
Limoges, France
CHU Hopital Edouard Herriot, Service Hepato-gastro-enterologie
Lyon, France
...and 16 more locations