BACKGROUND A simple method for arresting dentin caries with a tight seal of the cavity would exclude the need for injection and excavation, reduce the risk for dental fear and possibly postpone or eliminate the need for further treatment. AIM The aim is to evaluate success-rate and children's subjective experience of resin-based sealing (RBS) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) for treatment of occlusal dentin caries in primary molars. DESIGN Children aged 2-9 years will be recruited to undergo RBS- or GIC-treatment treatment for occlusal dentin caries in primary molars. A parent will answer the Short Form of Children's Fear Survey (CFSS-DS; parental version). No excavation but etching with 38% phosphoric acid will precede RBS. Topical and local anaesthesia and excavation with high speed bur will precede GIC. Time for treatment will be estimated. The children will rank their experience of each treatment on a 7-grade face scale. The dentist will evaluate the child's experience, cooperation and the overall experience of the treatment on a four-grade scale. The treatment will be evaluated as "without remark" or "defective" after 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. For statistical analysis the Chi-2-test, Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank-test and Paired t-test will be used.
BACKGROUND A simple method for arresting dentin caries with a tight seal of the cavity would exclude the need for injection and excavation, reduce the risk for dental fear and possibly postpone or eliminate the need for further treatment. AIM The aim is to evaluate success-rate and children's subjective experience of resin-based sealing (RBS) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) for treatment of occlusal dentin caries in primary molars. DESIGN Up to 300 children aged 2-9 years will be recruited to undergo RBS- or GIC-treatment treatment for occlusal dentin caries in primary molars. A parent will answer the Short Form of Children's Fear Survey (CFSS-DS; parental version). No excavation but etching with 38% phosphoric acid will precede RBS. Topical and local anaesthesia and excavation with high speed bur will precede GIC. Time for treatment will be estimated. The children will rank their experience of each treatment on a 7-grade face scale. The dentist will evaluate the child's experience, cooperation and the overall experience of the treatment on a four-grade scale. The treatment will be evaluated as "without remark" or "defective" after 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. For statistical analysis the Chi-2-test, Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank-test and Paired t-test will be used.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
70
Treatment success without defects after 3 years
Percentage of treatments (for each of the studied groups) without defects during the 3-year follow up period
Time frame: 3 years. Evaluation will be performed at each follow up visit - that is after 3 months, 6 months, 12 months ´, 24 months and after 36 months. Registration of possiblöe defects will be performed atv ech visit for each patient for each of the used methods.
Patient preferance
Comparing patiens´experience on a 7-grade face-scale (Bieri et al.1990) of the two treatments
Time frame: 3 years. From inclusion of first patient until the two treatments have been performed in each of the included children.
Dentist´s preferance
Comparing the dentists preferance of the two tretaments methods on a four grade rank-scale from "very bad" to "very good".
Time frame: 3 years. From inclusion of first patient until the two treatments have been performed in each of the included children.
Time used for the treatment
Evaluating time used for each of the two different treatment methods - measured in minutes.
Time frame: 3 years. From inclusion of first patient until the two treatments have been performed in each of the included children.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.