Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in parallel groups assessing the efficacy and safety of two doses of SOM3355 in patients suffering from Huntington's Disease with choreic movements.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
139
Treatment was blind for the whole duration of the study.
Treatment was blind for the whole duration of the study.
Treatment was blind for the whole duration of the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers
Angers, France
Change in Total Maximal Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS® for Subjects Not Taking Neuroleptics During the Trial (mITT - N=122)
Pre-defined analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint (change in TMC score from baseline to the end of maintenance dose) performed with the 122 subjects of the mITT not taking neuroleptics during the trial. The TMC is part of the motor assessment of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) and measures chorea in 7 different body parts, including the face, oral-buccal-lingual region, trunk, and each limb independently. The TMC score is the sum of the individual scores, ranging from 0 to 28. A decrease in TMC scores indicates improvement in chorea symptoms.
Time frame: From baseline to end of maintenance dose (10 weeks of treatment).
Change in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) (mITT - N=139)
The key secondary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Visit 5 (week 10). The key secondary efficacy analysis was conducted on the mITT Population, including 139 subjects. Subjects with a score of 1 (Very much improved), 2 (Much improved), or 3 (Minimally improved) were defined as "Improved", and patients with a score of 4 (No change), 5 (Worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse) were defined as "Not Improved".
Time frame: From baseline to end of maintenance dose (10 weeks of treatment).
Change in the Patient Global Impression (PGI) (mITT - N=139)
Another relevant secondary endpoint was the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Visit 5 (week 10). The efficacy analysis was conducted on the mITT Population, including 139 subjects. Subjects with a score of 1 (Very much improved), 2 (Much improved), or 3 (Minimally improved) were defined as "Improved", and patients with a score of 4 (No change), 5 (Worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse) were defined as "Not Improved".
Time frame: From baseline to end of maintenance dose (10 weeks of treatment).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU Hôpital Henri Mondor (APHP)
Créteil, France
Hôpital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille
Lille, France
Hopital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
Hôpital Purpan - CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, Germany
George Huntington Institut
Münster, Germany
Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum Taufkirchen
Taufkirchen, Germany
Hospital of University of Ulm
Ulm, Germany
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna
Bologna, Italy
...and 13 more locations