Patients who have undergone COVID-19 infection often have long-term sequelae. One of the most prevalent sequelae is pain. The main objective of this research is to investigate the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral principles-based treatment program in fear avoidance beliefs, disability, pain catastrophizing and pain interference.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
54
The treatment protocol had a total duration of 6 weeks. Two sessions were conducted each week, the first being a group session lasting 1.5 hours and the second an individual session lasting 45 minutes. During the group sessions, emotional disclosure and sharing of the experiences of patients with post COVID-19 syndrome were encouraged. During the individual sessions, a strong relationship was developed between the patient and the healthcare professional, with the healthcare professional helping the patient develop self-efficacy, thought monitoring, helpful self-talk, and reflection on changes in activity levels throughout the program.
Patients received an informational brochure in a consultation with a health professional. The brochure explained the importance of physical activity to improve the health condition of these patients. Patients had the opportunity to ask any questions to the healthcare professional.
Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.
Granada, Granada, Spain
Fear-avoidance belief changes
Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).
Time frame: Baseline
Fear-avoidance belief changes
Fear avoidance beliefs will be assessed by the the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). It consists of 16 sentences related to physical activity (first 5 items) and work (last 11 items).
Time frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in functionality
Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.
Time frame: Baseline
Changes in functionality
Changes in functionality were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2, which provides a global measure of disability and 7 domain-specific scores.
Time frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in pain catastrophizing
Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.
Time frame: Baseline
Changes in pain catastrophizing
Changes in pain catastrophizing were assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale. It consists of a 13-item scale with values from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the greater the pain catastrophization.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in pain interference
In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.
Time frame: Baseline
Changes in pain interference
In the PROMIS PI, item category responses range from 1 to 5. T scores had a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 points. Low scores on the PROMIS PI represent less interference of pain with physical function, whereas high scores represent greater interference with physical function.
Time frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention
Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain.
The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.
Time frame: Baseline
Changes in the sensory, affective and evaluative dimensions of pain.
The Short Form McGuill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a version of the original McGuill Pain Questionnaire, discovered by Melzak in 1987. This scale is divided into several parts. The first part consists of a list of 15 adjectives, including 11 sensory and 4 affective descriptors of pain (e.g., terrible, throbbing, etc.) on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), giving an overall score ranging from 0 to 45, as well as two scores from 0 to 33 for the sensory subscale and 0 to 12 for the affective subscale. In addition, it includes a VAS scale that assesses the patient's pain in the last week. Finally, it includes a Present Pain Intensity Scale (PPI). The PPI is based on a single item measuring overall pain intensity. Patients are asked about their current level of pain on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 5 (unbearable). This scale has been shown to have excellent psychometric properties.
Time frame: At 6 weeks at the end of the intervention