Effectiveness of a Novel Device for Cervical Training in Cervicogenic Headache.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya28 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results in cervical spine range of motion, endurance deep cervical muscles, headache impact and physical activity enjoyment by a training protocol with the new device for cervical treatment (CDAT) versus conventional training protocol (CT) in subjects with cervicogenic headache.

The cervical spine is the most mobile region of the spine and must be strong enough to support the weight of the skull. Strength deficits of the deep cervical muscles are related to different clinical conditions, such as cervicogenic headache. Cervicogenic headache is a secondary headache defined as a unilateral headache associated with neck pain, related to a decreased cervical range of motion and strength deficits of the deep cervical muscles. Training protocols can help to improve pain, function, posture and cross-sectional area. However, there are no training protocols in subjects with cervicogenic headache including deep neck extensor and flexor muscles. The cervical device treatment (CDAT) allows us to train the cervical flexor and extensor muscle in a simple and comfortable way.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Cervicogenic Headache

Interventions

Training protocol with the cervical device for treatment (CDAT).OTHER

Endurance training program of deep cervical flexors and deep cervical extensors with the cervical device for treatment.

Conventional training protocolOTHER

Endurance training program of deep cervical flexors and deep cervical extensors with the conventional protocol.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Deep flexor strength deficit in craniocervical flexion test. * Deep extensor strength deficit in neck extensor muscle endurance. * A positive result in the flexion-rotation test * ≥ 50 score in Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). * Diagnosis of cervicogenic headache according to Sjaastad et al. Subjects will have to fulfill both parts I and III of the major criteria for diagnosis (pain aggravated by neck movement, sustained position or external pressure, restricted cervical range of motion, and unilateral pain starting in the neck and radiating to the frontotemporal region) Exclusion Criteria: * Have received head/cervical treatment during the last six month, presented any red flag, neurological or cognitive impairment (inability to understand the questionnaires or examination). * Have received cervical manual therapy treatment during the last six month * A history of head/cervical trauma or surgery during the last year. * The use of pacemakers (the magnets in the CROM device could alter their signal * Inability to perform the flexion-rotation test.

Locations (1)

Élite Fisioterapia, María Montessori 2.

Zaragoza, Spain

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Flexion Rotation Test (FRT)

Mean change from baseline in Flexion-rotation test after 6 weeks and 10 weeks. The examiners assess the cervical ROM using CROM (Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument). Flexion rotation test will be evaluated. Flexion rotation test is used to see the amount of movement of the upper cervical spine and is the test most used in the literature. It is positive when there is a decrease of 10 degrees or more in the cervical rotation with maximum flexion, in a sense with respect to the contralateral or presents hypomobility of segment C1 with a mobility less than 32.

Time frame: Change between baseline and post intervention (6 weeks) and after 10 weeks.

Change in Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) (Headache Disfunction)

Mean change from baseline in Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) after 6 weeks and 10 weeks. The examiners assess the impact of headache on patients' lives using the HIT-6. Very severe impact: 60 or more. Major impact: 56-59 score Some impact: 50-55 score Little or no impact: 49 or less.

Time frame: Change between baseline and post intervention (6 weeks) and after 10 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes

Craniocervical flexion test

The examiners assess the strength of deep cervical flexors with craniocervical flexion test.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks, 10 weeks.

Cervical Spine Range of Motion (ROM).

Mean change from baseline in Cervical Spine Range of Movement (ROM) after 6 weeks and 10 weeks. The examiners assess the cervical ROM using CROM (Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument). Cervical flexion, extension, right/left sidebending, right/left rotation will be evaluated. The examiners assess the cervical ROM using CROM (Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument). Upper cervical flexion, upper cervical extension will be evaluated.\[Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks, 10 weeks\]

Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks, 10 weeks.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.