This feasibility study builds upon mental health and technology acceptance theoretical frameworks. It seeks to examine potentials of a mobile-based novel digital health solution based on emotional and behavioral change techniques, to provide emotional and self-management tailored support to caregivers of children with type I diabetes (T1D). The digital health program, called Adhera® Caring, is designed to be used for approximately 3 months. The study will enroll 100 participants (20 in sub-study 1 and 80 in sub-study 2) who are caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes. There will be a nurse coaching the participants by providing support related to their emotional wellbeing via the mobile solution.
Objectives: * Primary objective 1. To gather qualitative and quantitative information enabling to better understand psychological burdens that caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes and perceived barriers/facilitators for adoption of a digital health solution. * Primary objective 2. To assess positive mood states of caregivers of type 1 diabetes patients as an indicator of emotional wellbeing related to the use of the digital health solution. This is a prospective mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative) exploratory study composed of two sub-studies: * Qualitative sub-study 1 (SS1): One group of caregivers (n = 20) will engage with the digital health solution for 1 month. Subsequently, an individual semi-structured interview with each of the participants and a usability questionnaire will proceed to gather user experience qualitative information. * Quantitative sub-study 2 (SS2): A different group of caregivers (n = 80) will engage with the digital health solution for 3 months. As elaborated in the following sections, a quantitative approach will be adopted to assess different emotional and behavioral parameters before and after engaging with the digital health solution (pre-post design).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
The Adhera® Caring is a mobile based personalized digital intervention for caregivers, lasting for 1 or 3 months (depending on the sub-study).
Hospital Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Sub-study 1: Qualitative data of psychological burdens experienced as caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes and barriers/facilitators for adopting the digital health solution
A semi-structured interview based on a mental health and technology acceptance theoretical framework has been specifically designed for this purpose.
Time frame: 1 Month
Sub-study 2: Changes on caregiver's positive mood
Positive subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). Scores can range from 10-50 for both the Positive and Negative Affect with the lower scores representing lower levels of Positive/Negative Affect and higher scores representing higher levels of Positive/Negative Affect.
Time frame: 3 Months
Emotional outcome: Changes on caregiver's distress
Distress assessed with the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21). DASS-21 is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 21 items, 7 items per subscale: depression, anxiety and stress. Patients are asked to score every item on a scale from 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much). Sum scores are computed by adding up the scores on the items per (sub)scale and multiplying them by a factor 2. Sum scores for the total DASS-total scale thus range between 0 and 120, and those for each of the subscales may range between 0 and 42. Cut-off scores of 60 and 21 are used for the total DASS score and for the subscales respectively. Scores ≥60 (for DASS-total) and ≥21 (for the depression subscale) are labeled as "high" or "severe".
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Emotional outcome: Changes on caregiver's general wellbeing
Assessed with the short form of the Mental Health Continuum - short form questionnaire (MHC-SF). Total sum scores on the MHC-SF can range from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Emotional outcome: Changes on caregiver's perceived self-efficacy
Perceived self-efficacy assessment with the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL): Changes on the child's HRQoL
Children HRQoL assessment with KIDSCREEN-10 index answered by the caregiver as a proxy. The scores range between 10 and 50, and are linearly converted into 0-100 scale in which higher scores represent better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Life-style outcome: Adherence to Mediterranean diet
Assessed with the KIDMED questionnaire. This questionnaire consists of 16 questions, where negative answers are scored with 0, while affirmative answers are scored with +1/-1 depending on their positive or negative connotation.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Life-style outcome: physical activity (APALQ)
Physical activity assessed with Assessment Physical Activity Levels Questionnaire (APALQ). It is a self-administered questionnaire with 5 items scored 1 to 4/5, in which the sum of the answers classifies the global score in 3 categories: sedentary (5 to 10), moderately active (11-16), very active (+17).
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Knowledge of the disease and its treatment.
Medical checking questions related to the disease, its treatment and if the patients are following the multiple doses of insulin (MDI) or the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment.
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Behavioral outcome: objectively measured children's metabolic control to the treatment
Assessed from the sensor used via glucose monitoring
Time frame: Baseline up to week 12
Behavioral outcome: Usability
mHealth solution usability assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. SUS can range between 0 and 100 scores, with higher values representing higher usability.
Time frame: At week 4 (sub-study 1) or week 12 (sub-study 2)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.