During hospitalisations, older inpatients commonly face issues such as immobility, loss of independence, and functional decline. This leads them down the cascade of dependency with consequent increased risk of adverse outcomes, institutionalisation as well as higher post-acute care costs. The investigators hypothesize that by implementing a mobility intervention in the inpatient setting, patients would be able to maintain their function upon discharge and avoid the cascade of dependency. As such, the investigators aim to do this by implementing and evaluating a mobility intervention, while optimising reversible factors affecting mobility among inpatients admitted to a geriatric unit in Singapore. The investigators will also examine the cost impact of a mobility focused model of care and also adopt the effectiveness-implementation hybrid Type 2 design where both effectiveness and implementation spheres are tested simultaneously.
Aim 1: To examine the effectiveness of multicomponent, mobility-focused model of care in reducing iatrogenic complications and improving patient outcomes. Adopting the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) 4Ms framework ("Mobility", "Mentation, "Medication", and "What Matters"), the investigators will examine the effectiveness of timely and individually catered mobility interventions which not only increase mobilization but also optimize factors inhibiting mobility for elderly inpatients. It is hypothesized that the mobility outcomes, such as maximum distance walked and mobilization frequency will be significantly improved for patients who receive the intervention compared to those who receive standard care. Aim 2: To examine the cost impact of a mobility-focused model of care. The investigators will examine whether the cost of these multicomponent, mobility-focused interventions can be offset from cost savings from early mobilisation benefits, by comparing healthcare utilization costs between-groups. Further to that, a cost effectiveness analysis will be performed should functional effectiveness be observed. For the primary cost impact objective, it is hypothesized that the cost savings arising from reduction in bed days of hospitalization and other medical costs incurred during study period will outweigh the cost of implementing this model of care. In addition, it is also hypothesized that the proposed intervention will be cost-effective through achieving better functional outcomes for patients, with lower costs required. Aim 3: To evaluate the implementation outcomes of multicomponent, mobility-focused model of care in the process of this intervention. It is hypothesized that this intervention will have good acceptability, feasibility, penetration, implementation costs and sustainability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
The intervention group will receive early therapist review (within one working day of admission to HOME unit), to be mobilised at least three times a day. They will also receive additional group exercise therapy sessions, as well as nurse screening for geriatric syndromes. Besides that, they will be screened for 4Ms (Mobility, Mentation, Medication, What Matters) by doctor on admission.
Ng Teng Fong Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Geriatrics Education and Research Institute
Singapore, Singapore
Change in maximum distance walked
The total distance covered by the research participant (in meter)
Time frame: Upon admission and at the point of discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
Mobilisation frequency
Number of times mobilised. The average mobilisation frequency will be calculated by dividing the sum by the number of admission days.
Time frame: Through the duration of admission
Change in modified barthel score
The score ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 as the worst outcome
Time frame: Upon admission, at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay), and one-month post discharge
Change in gait speed
4 meter gait speed test (meter/second)
Time frame: Upon admission and at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
Inpatient length of stay and discharge location
The duration of admission (days) and the location the respective participant is discharged to
Time frame: The duration of admission and upon discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
Presence of common iatrogenic complications such as delirium, injurious falls, pressure ulcers, and venous thromboembolisms
Each of the complication will be measured in nominal scale; 0 denotes the absence of the complication while 1 denotes the presence of the complications. The total number of complications arise will be calculated. The greater the number indicates poorer outcome
Time frame: At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
Gross amount of patient's bill during index admission, considering subsidy level
The total gross amount of participant's bill during index admission. The subsidy level will be documented
Time frame: At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
The intervention related costs for group therapy
The number of group therapy sessions attended by the participant multiply by the cost for one group therapy session. The subsidy level will be documented.
Time frame: At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.