Femur fracture is a common injury occurring in the young due to trauma as well as amongst the elderly due to fall. Reduction and fixation of femur fractures pose a challenge to the anesthesiologist. These fractures are intensely painful as the pain arises from the periosteum and even slight movement can cause muscle forces to angulate and deform the fractured fragments which apart from causing extreme pain also make the reduction of the fracture quite difficult. Sub-arachnoid block (SAB) is a commonly used technique for lower-limb surgeries. It provides excellent surgical anesthesia and is a largely safe and reliable anesthetic technique. However, for femur fracture repair, positioning the patient for SAB not only causes extreme pain but it also makes administration of SAB difficult due to inappropriate position. Another limitation of SAB is its limited duration of action. Hence, conventional pain management modalities which include opioids and NSAIDs are used to manage pain before and during the administration of SAB and during the post-operative period. These conventional pain management drugs are associated with significant adverse effects and should be used with caution especially in the elderly with multiple comorbids. Recently, fascia iliaca block (FICB) has been used not only as part of multi-modal peri-operative analgesic regime for femur fractures but also to provide adequate analgesia for appropriate SAB positioning. FICB fills the plane underneath the fascia iliaca with local anesthetic and acts on the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous and obturator nerves and thus provides adequate analgesia for femur fractures for up to 24-48 hours. FICB is also associated with less side effects when compared to conventional pain management modalities and provides adequate unilateral analgesia with fewer autonomic and neurological complications when compared with epidural analgesia. Traditionally, local anesthetics have been used for most of the peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), however multiple adjuncts such as opioids, ketamine and clonidine have been used to prolong the duration of action as well as decrease the local anesthetic dosage. Among the adjuncts, dexamethasone has been used to generally favorable results in PNBs. Dexmedetomidine is another promising drug being used as a local anaesthetic adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. It is an alpha-2 agonist, which has shown to have prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia when given with LA for peripheral nerve blocks with other beneficial effects such as reducing the opioid consumption. In this study, the investigators compare dexamethasone with dexmedetomidine as an adjunct when combined with ropivacaine in FICB.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
Dexamethasone has been used to generally favorable results in peripheral nerve blocks as adjunct. Several studies have reported prolongation in the duration of ropivacaine, mepivacaine and bupivacaine when used in combination with dexamethasone. Various mechanisms for the beneficial adjunctive effect of dexamethasone with Local Anesthetics (LA) have been proposed. One theory suggests that the improved analgesia and increased blockade duration is due to its anti-inflammatory properties. It also acts as a local vasoconstrictor and thus may act by reducing LA absorption. Furthermore, it also increases the activity of inhibitory potassium channels on nociceptive C-Fibers.
Dexmedetomidine is another promising drug being used as a local anaesthetic adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks. It is an alpha-2 agonist, which has shown to have prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia when given with LA for peripheral nerve blocks with other beneficial effects such as reducing the opioid consumption. Alpha-2-agonists such as dexmedetomidine cause hyperpolarization-activated cation currents which inhibit the transmission of nociceptive fibers.
Pain score after fascia iliaca block placement
Static pain will be recorded at 5 minute interval with the help of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Static Pain at 5 minutes after placement of block.
Pain score after fascia iliaca block placement
Static pain will be recorded at 10-minute interval with the help of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Static Pain (at 10 minutes after placement of block.
Pain score during positioning of patient for sub-arachnoid block
After 15 minutes of fascia iliaca block placement, patients will be positioned for sub-arachnoid block. At this point, dynamic pain will be recorded with the help of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Dynamic Pain during positioning for sub-arachnoid block
Duration of postoperative analgesia
This will be measured by the demand to first rescue analgesic
Time frame: Till 24 hours post surgery
Post-operative Pain
Post-operative pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Arrival in PACU (0 hours)
Post-operative Pain
Post-operative pain will be assessed Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: 6 hours after surgery
Post-operative Pain
Post-operative pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery
Post-operative Pain
Post-operative pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction would be assessed via the Likert Scale
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.