Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)

Al-Azhar University42 enrolled

Overview

The aim of this study of this study is to compare two protocol of maxillary protraction in class III adolescent after using (MSE) Alt-RAMEC vs conventional rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)

Interventions

Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with Alt-RAMEC protocol.DEVICE

The current study was conducted on a total sample of 21 young adult orthodontic patients presented with class 3 retrognathic maxilla with or without transverse maxillary deficiency by Alt-RAMEC protocol.

Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with conventional protocolDEVICE

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 13 YearsMax age: 17 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Class3 Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background * Patients with retrognathic maxilla. * Patients with anterior cross-bite or incisor end-to-end relationship * Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. * Patients with no periodontal disease. * Patients with good oral hygiene and general health. * No systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment. * Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment. Exclusion Criteria: * previous orthodontic treatment. * Craniofacial syndrome.

Locations (1)

Mohamed Shendy

Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

amount of maxillary protraction

protraction of maxilla using CBCT

Time frame: 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.