To investigate the feasibility of physiological map generated from angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) (angio-FFR) pullback and its value in predicting physiological and clinical outcomes after stenting.
Physiological coronary lesion evaluation such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) is now recommended by guidelines to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it was not widely used in subsequent years for a variety of reasons, including the additional time needed to measure pressure wire-derived FFR, technical challenges and the small risk associated with maneuvering a pressure wire down a coronary artery, the added time to assess multiple vessels, issues with drift in the pressure wire reading, and the time, expense, and associated side effects with some hyperemic agents necessary to measure FFR. In recent years, advancements in technology made it possible to calculate FFR from conventional coronary angiography without the need of a pressure wire or hyperemic agent. The FAVOR III (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous InterVention in Patients With cORonary Artery Disease) China has demonstrated that angiography-derived FFR (angio-FFR) improved outcomes for PCI compared with a standard angiography-guided strategy. Like FFR, angio-FFR is also performed in a binary manner to determine whether a vessel requires intervention and does not automatically indicate the haemodynamic improvement that would be expected post stenting. However, one advantage of angio-FFR is that virtual pullback could be generated during its calculation. Most importantly, though hyperemic blood flow was applied in angio-FFR calculation, it was predicted from resting flow with mathematical algorithm. As resting flow is more constant, consistent, and predictable across different stenoses, then resting pressure changes measured along the length of a vessel will be more predictable. Using this property, a physiological vessel map could be produced with angio-FFR by co-registration the pullback onto coronary angiogram, which not only highlight functional significant lesions and lesion locations, but also offer the possibility of prospective simple computerized virtual PCI to assess the potential hemodynamic impact before actual stent implantation. In this regard, the investigators aim to calculate angio-FFR and to develop an angio-FFR pullback. And the investigators hypothesize that angio-FFR-derived pullback would be possible to produce a physiological map showing lesion severity and location, in addition, it could be used to perform virtual PCI and predict the physiological impact of stenting; the physiological map could be used to measure physiological lesion length and intensity.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
329
1. Pre-PCI angio-FFR was calculated and virtual pullback was generated 2. Automated algorithm to calculate delta angio-FFR per unit length and co-registered onto coronary angiogram was developed 3. PCI was performed using 2nd generation DES
Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, China
RECRUITINGPropotion of angio-FFR based physiological map successfully created
Propotion of successful angio-FFR based physiological map created by overlaying the angio-FFR based pullback onto coronary angiogram will be calculated
Time frame: Immediate after angiography
Correlation of predicted post-PCI angio-FFR by physiological map with angio-FFR after PCI
Pearson Correlation analysis will be performed to assess the correlation of predicted post-PCI angio-FFR by physiological map with angio-FFR after PCI
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI
Agreement of predicted post-PCI angio-FFR by physiological map with angio-FFR after PCI
Bland-altman analysis will be performed to assess the agreement of predicted post-PCI angio-FFR by physiological map with angio-FFR after PCI
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI
Correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR with pre-PCI FFR
Pearson Correlation analysis will be performed to assess the correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR with pre-PCI FFR
Time frame: Immediate after pre-PCI FFR measurement
Agreement of pre-PCI angio-FFR with pre-PCI FFR
Bland-altman analysis will be performed to assess the agreement of pre-PCI angio-FFR with pre-PCI FFR
Time frame: Immediate after pre-PCI FFR measurement
Correlation of post-PCI angio-FFR with post-PCI FFR
Pearson Correlation analysis will be performed to assess the correlation of post-PCI angio-FFR with post-PCI FFR
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI FFR measurement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Agreement of post-PCI angio-FFR with post-PCI FFR
Bland-altman analysis will be performed to assess the agreement of post-PCI angio-FFR with post-PCI FFR
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI FFR measurement
Correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR derived pullback pressure gradient (PPG) with post-PCI angio-FFR
Pearson Correlation analysis will be performed to assess the correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR derived pullback pressure gradient with post-PCI angio-FFR
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI
Correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR derived pullback pressure gradient with post-PCI FFR
Pearson Correlation analysis will be performed to assess the correlation of pre-PCI angio-FFR derived pullback pressure gradient with post-PCI FFR
Time frame: Immediate post-PCI
Target Vessel Failure
a composite of cardiac death, clinical-driven target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinical-driven target vessel revascularization. The target vessel will be defined as the treated vessel with 2nd generation DES which was assessed by post-stenting fractional flow reserve.
Time frame: 2 years after index procedure