The primary objective is to characterize the efficacy TEV-48574 in adult participants with IBD (moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD)) as assessed by induction of clinical remission (UC) and endoscopic response (CD) at week 14. Secondary objectives: * To evaluate the efficacy of 2 different doses of TEV-48574 as assessed by multiple standard measures * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 2 different doses of TEV-48574 * To evaluate the immunogenicity of 2 different dioses of TEV-48574 The study will consist of a screening period of up to 6 weeks (42 days), a 14-week treatment period, and a 4-week follow-up period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
290
Subcutaneous infusion
Matching Placebo
Teva Investigational Site 15568
Sun City, Arizona, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15556
San Diego, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15747
San Diego, California, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15357
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15563
Miami, Florida, United States
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC Who Showed Clinical Remission as Defined by the MMS
The MMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore as determined during central review. Each subscore was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). These individual subscores were summed up to give a total MMS ranging from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease), where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as MMS ≤2 points with Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and centrally read endoscopic score of 0 or 1, where a score of 1 did not include "friability".
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD Who Showed an Endoscopic Response as Defined by the SES-CD
The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: presence of ulcers, percentage of ulcerated surfaces, affected surface, and presence of strictures. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components was assessed in the 5 segments: the rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the 5 segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 (none) - 12 (severe) for each segment, and 0 (none) - 60 (severe) for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Endoscopic response at Week 14 in participants with moderate to severe CD was defined as a reduction in SES-CD of at least 50% from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC With a Clinical Response as Defined by the MMS
The MMS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. It consisted of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and endoscopic subscore as determined during central review. Each subscore was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). These individual subscores were summed up to give a total MMS ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease), where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the MMS of at least 2 points and at least a 30% reduction from baseline with either a decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC With Endoscopic Improvement as Defined by the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES)
The endoscopic subscore evaluation for the MMS consisted of independent, blinded, central review of a high-resolution recorded video. The endoscopic subscore assessed disease activity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe activity). Higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Endoscopic improvement was defined as a MES of 0 or 1 at Week 14.
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC With Endoscopic Remission as Defined by the MES
The endoscopic subscore evaluation for the MMS consisted of independent, blinded, central review of a high-resolution recorded video. The endoscopic subscore assessed disease activity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe activity). Higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Endoscopic remission was defined as a MES of 0 at Week 14.
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC With a Clinical Response as Defined by 2-item Patient-reported Outcome (PRO2) Score
The PRO2-UC score was derived from 2 parameters from the MMS: stool frequency and rectal bleeding, recorded daily by the participant using a handheld electronic diary over each of the preceding 7 days. Each parameter ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) with each subscore representing an average over the preceding 7 days. The total score was the summation of the subscores and therefore ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe activity), where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Clinical response was defined as decrease from baseline of at least 50% in PRO2 (stool frequency and rectal bleeding) at Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe UC With a Clinical Remission as Defined by PRO2 Score
The PRO2-UC score was derived from 2 parameters from the MMS: stool frequency and rectal bleeding, recorded daily by the participant using a handheld electronic diary over each of the preceding 7 days. Each parameter ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) with each subscore representing an average over the preceding 7 days. The total score was the summation of the subscores and therefore ranged from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 6 (severe activity), where higher scores indicated more severe disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as score of stool frequency = 0 and rectal bleeding = 0 on the PRO2 scale at Week 14.
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD With an Endoscopic Response as Defined by the Modified Multiplier-Simple Endoscopic Score (MM-SES-CD)
The MM-SES-CD is an endoscopic scoring tool that considers each individual parameter's prognostic value for achieving endoscopic remission while on active therapy. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: presence of ulcers, percentage of ulcerated surfaces, affected surface, and presence of strictures. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components was assessed in the 5 segments: the rectum, sigmoid and left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the 5 segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 (none) - 12 (severe) for each segment, and 0 (none) - 60 (severe) for the overall SES-CD score, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of inflammation. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in MM-SES-CD of ≥50% from baseline at Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD With a Clinical Response as Defined by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
The CDAI score consisted of an adjusted composite sum of 8 parameters, including daily diary evaluation for severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, very soft/liquid stool frequency, extra-intestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, body weight, and hematocrit. The subscores of abdominal pain (0 \[no pain\] to 3 \[worst pain\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), and number of very soft or liquid stools were then summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score that ranged from 0 (none) to 600 (severe) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Clinical response was defined as a ≥100-point decrease in CDAI score from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD With a Clinical Remission as Defined by CDAI Score
The CDAI score consisted of an adjusted composite sum of 8 parameters, including daily diary evaluation for severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, very soft/liquid stool frequency, extra-intestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, body weight, and hematocrit. The subscores of abdominal pain (0 \[no pain\] to 3 \[worst pain\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\]), and number of very soft or liquid stools were then summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score that ranged from 0 (none) to 600 (severe) with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score \<150 at Week 14.
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD With a Clinical Response as Defined by PRO2-CD Score
The PRO2-CD score was the sum of the daily stool frequency subscore (0 \[normal\] to 3 \[severe\]) and abdominal pain subscore (0 \[no pain\] to 3 \[worst pain\]) from the CDAI. Total PRO2-CD score ranged from 0 (normal) - 6 (severe), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These were recorded daily by the participant using a handheld electronic diary over each of the preceding 7 days. Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 50% in PRO2-CD (abdominal pain and stool frequency) at Week 14.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 14
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD With a Clinical Remission as Defined by PRO2-CD Score
The PRO2-CD score was the sum of the daily stool frequency subscore (0 \[normal\] to 3 \[severe\]) and abdominal pain subscore (0 \[no pain\] to 3 \[worst pain\]) from the CDAI. Total PRO2-CD score ranged from 0 (normal) - 6 (severe), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These were recorded daily by the participant using a handheld electronic diary over each of the preceding 7 days. Clinical remission was defined as abdominal pain ≤1 and stool frequency ≤3 on the PRO2-CD scale at Week 14
Time frame: Week 14
Number of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AEs were considered TEAEs if onset occurred on or after the first dose date. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 18
Number of Participants Who Stopped Taking the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 18
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs)
Treatment-emergent ADA positive: - the participant had a positive ADA sample (after first dose of study drug) but not at baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), or - the participant had a positive ADA sample at baseline (prior to first dose of study drug) and at the visit (after first dose of study drug), with at least a 4-fold increase in titer level.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 14, and 18
Number of ADA Positive Participants With the Presence of Neutralizing ADA
Treatment-emergent ADA positive: - the participant had a positive ADA sample (after first dose of study drug) but not at baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), or - the participant had a positive ADA sample at baseline (prior to first dose of study drug) and at the visit (after first dose of study drug), with at least a 4-fold increase in titer level.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 14, and 18
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Teva Investigational Site 15365
Miami, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15748
Miami, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15375
Orlando, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15359
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
Teva Investigational Site 15566
Glenview, Illinois, United States
...and 154 more locations