Aim: This study was conducted to determine the effect of case-based education on the development of clinical reasoning skills of nursing students in critical illnesses. Methods: The study was conducted between January 20 and June 30, 2021 using a pilot randomized controlled trial design. In the study, 22 volunteer students were assigned to the experimental and control groups by simple randomization. The experimental group was given case-based education to improve their clinical reasoning skills, and the control group continued the standard education process. Data were collected using a Student Information Form, the Clinical Reasoning Case Form (CRCF), the Student Satisfaction with Education Questionnaire, and a Form for Views on the Education. In the evaluation of data, frequency values, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests, Cohen's d coefficient for effect size, ITT analysis, and covariance analysis were used.
Aim of the study This study was conducted to determine the effect of case-based education on the development of nursing students' clinical reasoning skills in critical illnesses. Research hypotheses H01: There is no difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of their CRCF scores. H02: Case-based education on clinical reasoning has no positive effect on student satisfaction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
The education phase This stage included the explanation of the CR process, the analysis of CR cases, the drafting of new cases suitable for the CR process by students, and the analysis process. The education program was carried out on a web platform (Zoom) consistent with the changes in the COVID-19 pandemic process. The CR cases to be used in case-based education were sent to the students via e-mail before the group interview to make sure students came prepared for the group discussion. In case-based education, after the students read the case, they were asked some questions to determine their decisions and reasoning.
Ankara University Faculty of Nursing
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Student Information Form
This form consists of 9 questions, including students' nicknames, age, gender, duration of clinical experience, level of school success, and views on the nursing process
Time frame: The measurement was collected one week before education.
Clinical Reasoning Case Form (CRCF)
There were 10 clinical cases on the CRCF prepared for the objectives of these three steps in students' clinical reasoning process. The cases involved critical illness, and early warning findings that show worsening in critical illness and are used to determine priority nursing diagnosis. Five people, who were experts in the field of medical nursing and had clinical experience, were consulted between February 15 and 28, 2021 to confirm the clinical accuracy and reality of CR cases and their content and comprehensibility. The content validity index of expert opinions evaluated with the Davis technique was determined as 1.
Time frame: The first measurement was collected one week before education. The second measurement was collected 3 weeks after education.
Student Satisfaction with Education Questionnaire
A questionnaire adapted from the study of Lee et al. (2010) was used to evaluate students' satisfaction with the education given. A 6-point Likert-type scale (1= strongly disagree, 6= strongly agree) was used to evaluate the ten items of the questionnaire. The 10th item on the questionnaire is reverse coded. High scores on the questionnaire indicate a high level of satisfaction.
Time frame: The measurement was collected 3 weeks after education.
Form for Views on the Education
The effectiveness of the education model was evaluated by the researchers with a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) based on data collected from students in the experimental group without obtaining nicknames or personal information after the completion of the education via an online questionnaire that consisted of 4 questions about the strengths, weaknesses, perceived threats, and opportunities of the education model.
Time frame: The measurement was collected 3 weeks after education.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.