Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common chronic complications in type 2 diabetes, conventional drug therapy can only target a single pathogenesis but not treat Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) fundamentally. As a novel technique, stem cell transplantation provides a new option for patients with DPN. In 2012, Wuhan Central Hospital, took the lead in carrying out clinical research on the treatment of DPN with autologous bone marrow stem cells in China, and patients were significantly relieved. Based on this research, our clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HUC-MSCs in the treatment of refractory diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by formulating standard operating procedures (SOP) and quality standards (QS) to explore the possible mechanism of HUC-MSCs in the treatment of DPN.
As Diabetes is becoming a health problem of global concern rapidly, DPN, one of the common chronic complications in Diabetes is also getting more and more attention. The result of a survey of 5 regions in Southeast Asia showed that 39-72% of patients with DPN had severe or very severe impact on their quality of life. For the treatment of DPN, conventional drug therapy can almost only target a single pathogenesis and cannot treat it fundamentally. Therefore, new safe and effective treatment options for DPN are particularly important. Both here and abroad, large number of experimental studies have shown that Bone Marrow or Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells have a significant therapeutic effect on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In 2012, the Department of Endocrinology of Wuhan Central Hospital took the lead in conducting a clinical study of Autologous Bone Marrow Stem Cells in the treatment of DPN in China. The results of the study showed that the nerve conduction velocity of the lower extremities in most patients was improved within 3 months after treatment compared with before treatment. No serious adverse events occurred during the period. Based on this research of our own. The clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HUC-MSCs in the treatment of refractory diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by formulating standard operating procedures (SOP) and quality standards (QS) to explore the possible mechanism of HUC-MSCs in the treatment of DPN. The investigators will do a Single center, randomization, open trial, controlled clinical trials design to assess treatment with the MSCs compared with the control group. 42 patients with DPN will be recruited in China. 21 patients receive i. m. HUC-MSCs both lower extremities (5 × 10\^6 cells/mL, 1 mL per injection, each injection point is 2 cm apart ,1.0-1.5 cm deep, total amount of injection is estimated based on the surface area of the patient's lower limbs). 21 patients in the control group received i.v. Lipoic Acid Injection (600 mg/d for 15 consecutive days). Both efficacy and Adverse Event (AE) during the 96 weeks follow up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
42
5 × 10\^6 cells/mL, 1 mL per injection, each injection point is 2 cm apart ,1.0-1.5 cm deep, total amount of injection is estimated based on the surface area of the patient's lower limb
Lipoic Acid Injection,600 mg/d for 15 consecutive days
The Central Hospital of Wuhan
Wuhan, Hubei, China
RECRUITINGChange of TCSS scale
1. Excellent: TCSS score decreased by \>30% compared with the baseline value after treatment; 2. Effective: TCSS score decreased by 30%-15% compared with the baseline value after treatment; 3. Ineffective: Those who did not achieve the standards above after treatment.
Time frame: Change from Baseline TCSS scale at week 24
Change of nerve conduction velocities in the lower extremity
1. Excellent: after treatment, the lower extremity nerve conduction velocity and amplitude increased by more than 15% compared with the baseline value; 2. Effective: after treatment, the lower extremity nerve conduction velocity and amplitude increased by 15%-5% compared with the baseline value; 3. Ineffective: Those who did not achieve the standards above after treatment.
Time frame: Change from Baseline nerve conduction velocities in the lower extremity at week 12
Change of serum inflammatory factors
Observe the changes during the study period
Time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48, week 96
Change of growth factors (GF)
Observe the changes during the study period
Time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48, week 96
Change of fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
Observe the changes during the study period
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48, week 96
Change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Observe the changes during the study period
Time frame: Baseline, week 12, week 24, week 36, week 48, week 96
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.