Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman24 enrolled

Overview

The preparation of the implant site has a major influence on the success rate and long-term survival of dental implants. Piezoelectric devices and special implant drilling inserts are now emerging to replace conventional drills.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Implant Osteotomy

Interventions

Piezosurgery assisted osteotomyPROCEDURE

Sequential osteotomy drilling was done using mectron piezosurgery implant drilling protocol

Conventional drilling osteotomyPROCEDURE

bone osteotomy for implant placement was done following the BEGO Semados RS/RSX TrayPlus conventional drilling

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 30 YearsMax age: 50 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with bilateral missing premolars * Remaining bone height more ≥ 10mm. * Remaining bone width ≥ 6mm Exclusion Criteria: * patients that smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day * Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease. * Presence of bone pathology within the future osteotomy site

Locations (1)

Beirut Arab University

Beirut, Lebanon

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time of surgery

Average surgical times for implant site was estimated

Time frame: through operation completion

Change in implant stability

ISQ was measured using ostell device

Time frame: at baseline and 4 months

Change in bone density

Mean bone density using CBCT

Time frame: at baseline and 4 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.