The purpose of the study is to evaluate the appropriateness, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability of implementation strategies and Cabotegravir (CAB) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The study objectives are also to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. The first of two participant types in the study are the Patient Study Participants (PSPs) will refer to individuals who are enrolled in the study and who will receive commercially available CAB PrEP via prescription from the PrEP provider. The second are Staff Study Participants (SSPs) who are site staff involved in the administrative and clinical aspects of offering and administering PrEP to PSPs at the clinical site.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
370
Available as intramuscular injection.
Available as marketed orally administered tablets.
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
...and 12 more locations
Mean Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score in SSPs
The responses for appropriateness will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Mean IAM Score in SSPs at Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
The responses for appropriateness will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Change from Baseline in Mean IAM Score in SSPs at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
The responses for appropriateness will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Baseline (Month 1) and Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Appropriateness of APRETUDE Assessed by SSP Questionnaire responses at Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Appropriateness of APRETUDE Assessed by Semi-structured interview (SSI) at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Appropriateness of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Appropriateness of APRETUDE Assessed by Semi-structured interview (SSI) at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Appropriateness of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5 12 and 13
Mean IAM Score in PSPs at Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
The responses for appropriateness will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Change from Baseline in Mean IAM Score in PSPs at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
The responses for appropriateness will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Baseline (Month 1) and Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception of Appropriateness of APRETUDE Assessed by PSP Questionnaire responses at Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception of Appropriateness of APRETUDE Assessed by SSI in PSPs at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception of Appropriateness of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Number of cis-and trans Black women who Complete a Sexual Health Assessment through Month 13 in ECI Arm based on site-level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Number of PSPs who Complete a Sexual Health Assessment through Month 13 in ECI Arm based on Site-level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Number of cis-and trans Black Women who Initiate APRETUDE through Month 13 by Study Arm Based on Site level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Number of cis-and trans Black Women who Initiate APRETUDE through Month 13 by Clinic Characteristics Based on Site level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of cis-and trans Black Women who Initiate APRETUDE through Month 13 by Study Arm Based on Site level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of cis-and trans Black Women who Initiate APRETUDE through Month 13 by Clinic Characteristics Based on Site level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Number of cis-and trans Black Women who Continue APRETUDE beyond a First Dose through Month 13 by study arm based on Site-level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Number of cis-and trans Black Women who Continue APRETUDE beyond a First Dose through Month 13 by Clinic Characteristics based on Site-level PrEP Information Questionnaire
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Mean Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score in SSPs for Implementation Strategies
The responses for feasibility will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1 and 4, 5, 12 and 13
Change from Baseline in FIM Score in SSPs for Implementation Strategies
The responses for feasibility will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Baseline (Month 1) and Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Feasibility of Strategy Assessed by SSPs Questionnaire responses at Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Feasibility and Utility of Strategy Assessed in SSPs by SSI at Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception of Appropriateness of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Proportion of SSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the Implementation science questionnaire (ISQ) that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Study Arm
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of SSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the ISQ that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Clinic Characteristics
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of SSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the ISQ that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Patient Subgroups
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of PSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the Implementation science questionnaire (ISQ) that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Study Arm
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of PSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the ISQ that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Clinic Characteristics
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of PSPs that Respond in Agreement on Relevant Items on the ISQ that each implementation tool and strategy is fit for use through Month 13 Based on Patient Subgroups
ISQ measures a range, including acceptability, feasibility, and utility.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Perceptions of Utility of Implementation tools and strategies Assessed by SSIs in PSPs through Month 13 based on Patient Subgroups
Perceptions of Utility of Implementation tools and strategies will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Proportion of Injections Occurring Within Target Window from Target Date (+-7 days of target date)
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Perception of Barriers and Facilitators to Fidelity to Injections Window Assessed by SSIs in PSPs
Perception of Barriers and Facilitators to Fidelity to Injections Window will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 1 and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1 and 13 who start with oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 12 and 13
Perception of Barriers and Facilitators to Fidelity to Injections Window Assessed by Surveys in PSPs
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception of Barriers and Facilitators to Fidelity to Injections Window Assessed by Implementation Monitoring Calls (IMC) in SSPs
Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5 and 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Proportion of PSPs completing target number of injections
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Barriers, Facilitators, Concerns and Perception to Implementation in SSPs and PSPs Assessed by Questionnaire responses
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception to Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation in SSPs Assessed by SSI
Perception to Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5 and 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception to Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation in SSPs Assessed by IMC
Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 5 and 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception to Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation in PSPs Assessed by SSI
Perception to Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 1 and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1 and 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 12 and 13
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score for APRETUDE in SSPs and PSPs
The responses for acceptability will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
FIM Score for APRETUDE in SSPs and PSPs
The responses for feasibility will be measured on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 with higher values representing better outcomes. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Feasibility and Acceptability of APRETUDE in SSPs and PSPs Assessed by Questionnaire Responses
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Feasibility and Acceptability of APRETUDE in SSPs Assessed by SSIs
Feasibility and Acceptability of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 4, 12 and 13
Feasibility and Acceptability of APRETUDE in PSPs Assessed by SSIs
Feasibility and Acceptability of APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 1 and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1 and 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 12 and 13
Proportion of PSPs that have one Oral lead-in before CAB Injection
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in in SSPs Assessed by SSI
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview. Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in SSPs Assessed by Survey responses
Data will be collected at Month 1, 4, and 12 for participants who start with injections and at Month 1, 5, 13 for participants who start with the oral lead in.
Time frame: Month 1, 4, 5, 12 and 13
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in PSPs Assessed by SSIs
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview.
Time frame: Month 1
Perception on Reason for Decision to Use Oral lead-in PSPs Assessed by Survey Responses
Time frame: Month 1
Proportion of PSPs that Complete a Sexual Health Assessment and Start or Switch from Oral PrEP to APRETUDE
Time frame: Up to Month 13
Reasons for Choosing or Switching from Oral PrEP to APRETUDE in PSPs Assessed by SSIs
Reasons for Choosing or Switching from Oral PrEP to APRETUDE will be measured from themes emerging from Proctor and CFIR framework guided semi-structured qualitative interview.
Time frame: Up to Month 13
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.