This phase I trial evaluates the effects of bicalutamide, compared to no study drug (NSD), on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bicalutamide is in a class of medications called androgen receptor inhibitors. It works by blocking the effects of androgen (a male reproductive hormone) to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. Previous studies have suggested that expression of a protein called EGFR on tumor cells is related to bladder cancer disease progression. This trial may help doctors evaluate if bicalutamide has any effect on EGFR expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor (measured as a ratio relative to urothelium and lamina-propria specific markers) in participants treated with anti-androgen therapy versus (vs.) participants given NSD. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine effect of bicalutamide on EGFR expression (by rtPCR) in the subgroup of patients whose normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor expresses the androgen receptor (AR) (at least "1" by immunohistochemistry \[IHC\] score). II. To correlate AR expression in adjacent urothelium (by IHC score) with EGFR expression by rtPCR in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. III. Comparison of toxicity in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Comparison of AR and EGFR (and possibly phosphorylated EGFR \[pEGFR\]) staining levels (low, moderate, high; by immunocytology) in pre-treatment vs. post-treatment bladder wash cytology. II. To compare expression of direct androgen response gene (ADAR)-2 measured by rtPCR in normal appearing adjacent (to tumor) urothelium that does and does not express AR (by IHC), in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. III. Ki-67 expression (by IHC) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. IV. Subgroup analysis of Ki-67 expression in the AR+ subgroup. V. Differences in expression of AR, EGFR, pEGFR, and Ki-67 (by semi-quantitative IHC) in tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. VI. Comparison of demographics of two groups. VII. Change in EGFR expression by rt-PCR in tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. VIII. Morbidities of treatment (breast tenderness, sexual or urinary side effects, seizure\[s\], depression, abnormal liver function tests \[LFTs\]). IX. Comparison of pre vs. post intervention urinary biomarkers (CxBladderTM) in both groups, examining the 5 RNAs (by rtPCR) that make up the test, both as a group and each RNA separately. X. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation analysis in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks from neighboring normal urothelium and tumor tissue in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. XI. Define changes in the tumor immune microenvironment pre- and post-bicalutamide through liquid biopsies of blood and urine using high-dimensional flow cytometry. XII. Analyze tumor (biopsy specimen) immune microenvironment via multiplex immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics. XIII. Compare AR, EGFR, and pEGFR in biopsies of tumors done at index cystoscopy vs. TURBT in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. (Optional) XIV. Other exploratory markers such as changes in the urinary microbiome in bladder cancer participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: Patients receive bicalutamide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21. Patients undergo TURBT on day 21. Up to 28 days of bicalutamide prior to TURBT is permitted in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo tumor biopsy at baseline. ARM 2: Patients receive NSD PO QD on days 1-21. Patients undergo TURBT on day 21. Up to 28 days of NSD prior to TURBT is permitted in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo tumor biopsy at baseline. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up 20-30 days after TURBT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
80
Given PO
Undergo tumor biopsy
Undergo blood and urine sample collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo TURBT
University of Arizona Cancer Center - Prevention Research Clinic
Tucson, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGCedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNational Cancer Institute Urologic Oncology Branch
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center - University Hospital
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGAverage Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) expression level
Will be analyzed as a continuous variable. A two-sample t-test will be conducted to test whether there are significant differences of the log-transformed EGFR expression level (measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction \[rtPCR\]) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor in participants treated with anti-androgen therapy versus (vs.) NSD participants. In case the normality assumption of the two-sample t-test does not hold, Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. Considering androgen receptor (AR) status can be a treatment effect modifier, a regression analysis will also be performed with the log-transformed EGFR expression level as the outcome and treatment status (bicalutamide or NSD), AR status, and treatment-AR interaction as the predictors.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Effect of bicalutamide on EGFR expression
A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be conducted to compare the difference of EGFR expression in AR positive participants treated with and without bicalutamide.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
AR expression in adjacent urothelium
Will evaluate the correlation between AR expression in adjacent urothelium with EGFR expression. Pearson correlation and Spearman's rank correlation will be calculated between the AR expression and EGFR expression.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Toxicity of treatment
Toxicity of treatment may include breast tenderness, sexual or urinary side effects, seizure(s), depression, abnormal liver function tests. Descriptive statistics will be provided for these outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.