This trial will assess the MTD and RP2D of SOT102 administered as monotherapy (Part A) and in combination with first-line SoC treatment (nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine; Part B) and efficacy of SOT102 administered as monotherapy (Part C) and in combination with first-line SoC treatment (Part D) in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
The trial will have the following parts: * Part A: Dose escalation, first-in-human, single-agent phase 1 trial of SOT102 in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with unmet medical need (CLDN18.2 agnostic) * Part B : Phase 1b dose escalation combination trial of SOT102 in combination with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine as SoC regimen for first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (CLDN18.2 agnostic) Once an RP2D in the respective phase 1 evaluation (Part A and Part B) has been identified, expansion parts (Part C and Part D) are planned: * Part C : Single-agent SOT102 expansion at RP2D identified in Part A in pancreatic cancer after one or more prior systemic therapies (second+ line) for locally advanced or metastatic disease (CLDN18.2 positive) * Part D : SOT102 in combination with nab- paclitaxel/gemcitabine for first-line treatment expansion at RP2D identified in Part B in pancreatic cancer (CLDN18.2 positive)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
31
SOT102 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CLDN18.2 with the anthracycline PNU as cytotoxic moiety.
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, Belgium
Parts A and B: The Definition of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of SOT102 Given as Monotherapy and in Combination With First-line SoC Treatment
MTD is defined as the highest dose level tested below the dose level associated with ≥33% of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable patients experiencing a DLT. The RP2D will be selected based on evaluation of the totality of all data. The trial was halted early due to safety signals not initially deemed DLTs that were seen across different dose levels. After a protocol amendment formally defined this signal as a DLT, the trial was restarted, but the same safety signal reappeared. Following a review by the independent Dose Escalation Committee, the trial was terminated.
Time frame: Through Cycles 1-2 (28 days)
Parts C and D: The Assessment of the Efficacy of SOT102 in Monotherapy and in Combination With First-line SoC Treatment
Efficacy is determined by objective response rate (ORR) determined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever is first, to be assessed up to approximately 4 years
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With DLTs
Adverse events (AEs) graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.0 considered DLTs: All grade 5 events not clearly related to disease progression or any other causes; Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity regardless of duration; Grade 2 or higher serum creatinine elevation; Hy's law cases; Any grade 2 pneumonitis that does not resolve to grade 1 within 3 days of the initiation of maximal supportive care; Recurrent grade 2 pneumonitis; Grade 2 or higher proteinuria; Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 days; Febrile neutropenia; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. AEs NOT considered DLTs: Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that can be controlled within 72 hours; Grade 3 fatigue less than 5 days; Grade 3 or higher correctable electrolyte abnormalities that last less than 72 hours and not associated with clinical complications; Grade 3 or higher amylase or lipase
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masarykův Onkologický Ústav
Brno, Czechia
Institut Gustave Roussy
Paris, France
VHIO - Vall d'Hebron Institut d'Oncologia
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro
Madrid, Spain
Time frame: Through Cycles 1-2 (28 days)
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs)
A TEAE is defined as an AE that: * emerges during SOT102 treatment, having been absent at the time of pre-treatment (screening), or * re-emerges during SOT102 treatment, having been present at the time of pre-treatment (screening), or * worsens in severity during SOT102 treatment relative to the pre-treatment state if the AE is continuous.
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With SOT102-related AEs
Causal relationship (relatedness) of all AEs will be assessed by investigators and classified as follows: * Not suspected: It is not plausible that the AE is caused by medication/procedure and a likely alternative explanation exists. No reasonable possibility of a causal or temporal relationship. * Suspected: It is plausible that the AE is caused by medication/procedure. Reasonable possibility of a causal relationship.
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Part B (Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With SoC-related AEs
Causal relationship (relatedness) of all AEs will be assessed by investigators and classified as follows: * Not suspected: It is not plausible that the AE is caused by medication/procedure and a likely alternative explanation exists. No reasonable possibility of a causal or temporal relationship. * Suspected: It is plausible that the AE is caused by medication/procedure. Reasonable possibility of a causal relationship.
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With Serious AEs (SAEs)
An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose fulfills one or more of the following criteria: * Results in death * Is immediately life-threatening * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Is another medically significant event defined as an event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent any of the above listed outcomes
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation of SOT102
AEs (intercurrent illness or trial treatment-related toxicity) that would, in the judgment of the investigator, affect assessments of clinical status to a significant degree or require discontinuation of trial treatment
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Part B (Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation of SoC
AEs (intercurrent illness or trial treatment-related toxicity) that would, in the judgment of the investigator, affect assessments of clinical status to a significant degree or require discontinuation of trial treatment
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants Who Died
Date of death and immediate and underlying causes of death will be collected.
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Coagulation, Hematology, Clinical Chemistry and Urinalysis) of Grade 3 or Higher Graded According to NCI CTCAE Version 5.0
The following laboratory parameters will be assessed: * Coagulation: prothrombin time, INR * Hematology: leukocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, differential * Clinical chemistry: ALT, albumin, ALP, amylase, AST, bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen or blood urea, calcium, creatinine, glucose (fasting), LDH, lipase, magnesium, potassium, sodium, TSH (gastric adenocarcinoma only) * Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones, pH, protein, specific gravity, urine leukocyte esterase
Time frame: Day 1 up to approximately 2 years and 8.5 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Characterization of Cmax of SOT102
Assessment of concentration of SOT102 and its derivates at various timepoints
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until Day 1 of Cycle 5
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Characterization of Tmax of SOT102
Assessment of concentration of SOT102 and its derivates at various timepoints
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until Day 1 of Cycle 5
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Characterization of AUClast of SOT102
Assessment of concentration of SOT102 and its derivates at various timepoints
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until Day 1 of Cycle 5
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Evidence of SOT102 Activity in Monotherapy in Individual Patients - BOR: Complete Response
Detection of anecdotal tumor response in individual patient, as per RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever is first, assessed up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Evidence of SOT102 Activity in Monotherapy in Individual Patients - BOR: Partial Response
Detection of anecdotal tumor response in individual patient, as per RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever is first, assessed up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Evidence of SOT102 Activity in Monotherapy in Individual Patients - BOR: Stable Disease
Detection of anecdotal tumor response in individual patient, as per RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever is first, assessed up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Evidence of SOT102 Activity in Monotherapy in Individual Patients - BOR: Progressive Disease
Detection of anecdotal tumor response in individual patient, as per RECIST 1.1 criteria
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever is first, assessed up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
Parts A and B (Monotherapy and Combination With SoC): Number of Participants With Antibodies Against SOT102
Identification of patients who develop detectable antibodies against any part of SOT102
Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until 30 (+5) days after the last dose of SOT102, assessed up to approximately 2 years and 9 months