Co-administration of cannabis and tobacco is a common practice, but there is little experimental evidence aimed at understanding the reasons for this prevalence. Some preliminary evidence suggests that tobacco may actually counteract the cognitive-impairing effects of cannabis, and may also increase the subjective ('liking') effects of cannabis, but results are inconclusive. Further, there are no studies into the effects of tobacco on other cannabis-related harms such as driving, or on the ability of tobacco to alter the blood levels of THC, the chemical responsible for the psychoactive properties of cannabis. The purpose of the present study will be to evaluate the effects of tobacco, cannabis or combinations of tobacco and cannabis on driving, cognition, subjective effects and blood THC. Driving will be assessed using a state-of-the-art driving simulator that allows for the safe and objective measurement of the effects of intoxicating substances on driving. Participants will be regular users of cannabis and will be invited to the lab for four counterbalanced test sessions. In these test sessions they will drive the simulator and undergo cognitive tests before and after smoking: 1) cannabis; 2) tobacco; 3) cannabis + tobacco; or 4) placebo. Outcomes will be measured at several time points after smoking the product. Participants will also give blood for determination of levels of THC, and will complete subjective effects questionnaires both before and after smoking the cigarette. This study will be one of the first experimental laboratory studies of the reasons behind co-administration of tobacco and cannabis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
Dried flower cannabis cigarette with 22% THC
Dried flower cigarette with active nicotine
Dried flower cigarette with active nicotine and cannabis
Dried flower cigarette with both placebo tobacco and cannabis
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGStandard deviation of lateral position
car 'weaving'
Time frame: baseline
Standard deviation of lateral position
car 'weaving'
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Standard deviation of lateral position
car 'weaving'
Time frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Speed
Speed (in km) of the car
Time frame: baseline
Speed
Speed (in km) of the car
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Speed
Speed (in km) of the car
Time frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Reaction time
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
Time frame: baseline
Reaction time
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Reaction time
Time to hit the brake after introduction of an obstacle
Time frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Collisions
number of times the car hit an obstacle
Time frame: baseline
Collisions
number of times the car hit an obstacle
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Collisions
number of times the car hit an obstacle
Time frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Concentration of THC (ng/ml)
Psychoactive component of cannabis
Time frame: Baseline
Concentration of THC (ng/ml)
Psychoactive component of cannabis
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
Time frame: baseline
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Processing Speed
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision
Time frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
Time frame: baseline
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
Time frame: 60 minutes
Useful Field of View Divided attention
Mean threshold for discriminating stimuli presented in central vision, with a concurrent perpheral target task
Time frame: 210 minutes
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
Time frame: baseline
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
Time frame: 60 minutes
Useful Field of View Selective attention
Mean threshold for divided attention but with distractors
Time frame: 210 minutes
Trail making task
Cognitive assessment
Time frame: baseline
Trail making task
Cognitive assessment
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Trail making task
Cognitive assessment
Time frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Verbal free recall
Test of memory
Time frame: baseline
Verbal free recall
Test of memory
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Verbal free recall
Test of memory
Time frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
Time frame: baseline
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Addiction Research Centre Inventory
Test of mood with 53 true-false questions that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores reflecting greater mood
Time frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Profile of Mood States
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
Time frame: baseline
Profile of Mood States
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Profile of Mood States
Test of mood with 76 items with a five point scale that are summed to produce a measure of the intensity of mood, with higher scores indicating more agreemen
Time frame: 210 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: baseline
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 15 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 60 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 120 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 180 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 240 minutes post smoking
Visual Analog Scale
test of mood on a scale from 0 to 100, with greater number indicating more agreement
Time frame: 300 minutes post smoking
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.