Chronic periodontitis is an infectious disease of periodontal support tissues caused by bacterial biofilm, which leads to inflammation and destruction of periodontal support tissues ultimately resulting in tooth loss.In the clinic, patients with Stage III and Grade B periodontitis are difficult to gain desired outcomes on account of deep periodontal pockets, complicated anatomy, the removal of subgingival dental biofilms, and control of residual inflammation. A large number of studies have indicated that the effectiveness of local application of antibiotics as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP), such as the antimicrobial and minocycline hydrochloride could affect bacterial metabolism and inhibit biofilm attachment particularly in terms of pocket depth reduction and attachment level gain. However, the use of wide-spectrum antibiotics may cause some inevitable side effects including drug resistance, pathogens and probiotics were eliminated leading to diversity of microbiota diminished, and toothstaining. To solve the problems of antibiotics in the clinic, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) may be considered as an alternative to conventional antibiotics drugs.In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to evaluate the effects of AMPs as an addition to SRP on clinical parameters and microbiological biofilms in patients with Stage III and Grade B periodontitis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
51
The patients were divided into subgingival scaling, and Oral Biological Antimicrobial Gel was used in the periodontal pocket after scaling. The injection probe with gel was inserted into the periodontal pocket, and the injection was slowly pushed, and the injection was gradually withdrawn during the injection, until a little gel was found at the mouth of the bag.
The patients were divided into subgingival scaling, and minocycline hydrochloride ointment was used in the periodontal pocket after scaling. The injection probe with gel was inserted into the periodontal pocket, and the injection was slowly pushed, and the injection was gradually withdrawn during the injection, until a little gel was found at the mouth of the bag.
only scaling and root planning was performed on the patient
BeijingSHCMU
Beijing, China
Periodontal Probing Depth
from the gingival margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket were assessed using a Williams periodontal probe((Hu-Friedy)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Periodontal probing depth at 90 days
Attachment Level Were Assessed Using a Williams Periodontal Probe((Hu-Friedy)
from the cementoenamel junction, crown margin or restoration to the bottom of the pocket
Time frame: Change from Baseline Attachment level at 90 days
Bleeding Index Were Assessed Using a Williams Periodontal Probe((Hu-Friedy) ,the Rating Method Was Assessed Using the Criteria of Mazza.
Bleeding index : 0 = normal appearance of the gingiva and no bleeding on sulcus probing. 1. = normal appearance of the gingiva but bleeding on probing of the sulcus. 2. = bleeding on probing and gingival color change without swelling. 3. = bleeding on probing, gingival color change with mild swelling. 4. = bleeding on probing with marked gingival swelling, with or without color change. 5. = bleeding on probing, L Spontaneous bleeding, gingival color change with marked swelling, with or without ulceration.
Time frame: Change from Bleeding index at 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.