Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SLN360 administered subcutaneously (SC) compared with placebo in adult participants with elevated lipoprotein(a) at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
180
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Time-averaged Percent Change In Lipoprotein(a) Molar Concentration From Baseline to Week 36
Clinical trial results (relative to Day 1 pre-dose) was calculated for each participant by estimating the sum of the area under the curve with the linear trapezoidal method for all scheduled assessments from Week 4 to Week 36, inclusive, divided by the total time interval between the Week 4 and Week 36 assessments. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences between each active treatment group and the pooled placebo groups in the primary outcome measure. Time-averaged percent change in lipoprotein(a) to Week 36 was the dependent variable, and treatment group was included as the predictor variable. The least squares means, standard errors, and 2-sided 95% confidence intervals for each treatment group and for the pairwise comparisons between the SLN360 and placebo groups were estimated.
Time frame: Week 36
Time-averaged Percent Change In Lipoprotein(a) Molar Concentration From Baseline to Week 48
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 48
Time-averaged Percent Change In Lipoprotein(a) Molar Concentration From Baseline to Week 60
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 60
Time-averaged Percent Change In Apolipoprotein B Concentration From Baseline to Week 36
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 36
Time-averaged Percent Change In Apolipoprotein B Concentration From Baseline to Week 48
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Adelaide, Australia
Monash Health
Melbourne, Australia
Linear Clinical Research
Nedlands, Australia
Medicus Services SRO
Brandýs nad Labem, Czechia
Edumed s.r.o., Kardiologicka, endokrinologicka, diabetologicka a interni ambulance Nachod
Náchod, Czechia
Pratia Pardubice a.s.
Pardubice, Czechia
Endokrinologie Cerny Most s.r.o.
Prague, Czechia
Gentofte Hospital
Hellerup, Denmark
Regionshospitalet Godstrup
Herning, Denmark
Viborg Regional Hospital
Viborg, Denmark
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: Week 48
Time-averaged Percent Change In Apolipoprotein B Concentration From Baseline to Week 60
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 60
Time-averaged Percent Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration From Baseline to Week 36
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 36
Time-averaged Percent Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration From Baseline to Week 48
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 48
Time-averaged Percent Change In Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration From Baseline to Week 60
Time-averaged secondary endpoints were calculated and analysed using the same conventions as the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Week 60