Aortic valve sclerosis (aortic valve thickening and calcification without pressure gradient) is one of the most common valvular abnormalities in the Western world. Per year, about 1.8-1.9% of these patients develop aortic valve stenosis which will eventually be treated by TAVI (Transcatheter aortic valve implantation). The purpose of this study is to collect and monitor ongoing safety and performance clinical data of the ACURATE neo2™ aortic bioprosthesis and the ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral delivery system, hereafter referred to as the ACURATE neo2™ and transfemoral delivery system in the context of an observational investigator initiated trial (IIT).
There are four leading causes of valvular aortic valve stenosis, namely: calcific aortic stenosis, congenital aortic valve malformations, rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, and endocarditis. Calcific aortic valve stenosis is a chronic progressive disease, and the predominant cause of aortic valve stenosis in the Western world. Multiple mechanisms influencing the progression of aortic valve stenosis have been identified. However, there is still no sufficient drug therapy to stop or reverse the process. If high-grade aortic valve stenosis becomes symptomatic, death rates increase up to 50% in 2 years.Many patients with severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis are successfully treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), which can reduce symptoms and improve survival. However, up to one-third of symptomatic patients are considered inoperable due to comorbidities and the high risk of surgery. This treatment gap forced the development of less invasive approaches for patients with aortic stenosis considered inoperable and led to the development of TAVI. Later, TAVI has also been considered in the European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (ESC/EACTS) 2017 and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease and intermediate surgical risk and recently, new landmark studies have expanded the use of TAVI into the low surgical risk field. For the establishment of TAVI as the first line treatment option in lower risk patients, further improvement with regard to adverse outcomes associated with TAVI (e.g. vascular complications, rates of paravalvular leak/aortic regurgitation and the need for permanent pacemakers) will be essential. Therefore, large registries are needed to detect rare events and tendencies in a real-world setting. The PROVE study will collect baseline, procedural and follow-up data. In addition, it will serve as an imaging library (angiography, echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography) to evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of the ACURATE neo2.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,043
The study will collect data from patients treated with the ACURATE neo2™ and its transfemoral delivery system following standard TAVI practice at each participating center. All patients will be followed to 12 months after the implant procedure. The study is divided into three periods: 1. Screening period: from screening to enrollment if study criteria are met. 2. Implantation procedure: immediately pre-implant to 24 hours post-procedure. 3. Follow-up period: at hospital discharge, at 30 days and at 12 months post-procedure.
Jacques Cartier Private Hospital Massy
Massy, France
Centre Cardiologique du Nord Saint-Denis
Saint-Denis, France
Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
Augsburg, Germany
Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH
Bad Berka, Germany
Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH
Bad Nauheim, Germany
Rhön Klinikum, Campus Bad Neustadt
Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW
Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Schüchtermann-Schiller'sche Kliniken Bad Rothenfelde GmbH & Co. KG
Bad Rothenfelde, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Cologne, Germany
...and 17 more locations
Time to all-cause death
The individual survival time is calculated from the day of procedure up to death of any cause or up to the last last date on which the patient was known to be alive.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mortality (count)
Numbers by cause and timing period
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mortality (rate)
Rates, by cause and timing period
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Neurological events (count)
Numbers by type, grading and timing
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Neurological events (rate)
Rates by type, grading and timing
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Myocardial infarction (count)
Numbers by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Myocardial infarction (rate)
Rates, by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Re-hospitalization (count)
Re-hospitalization yes/no: numbers -\> Total number of re-hospitalization per patient, by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Re-hospitalization (cumulative incidence)
Re-hospitalization yes/no: rates Cumulative incidence of first re-hospitalization, by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Bleeding events (count)
Numbers by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Bleeding events (rate)
Rates by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Transfusions
Total number per patient, by timing period
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Vascular and access-related complications (count)
Numbers by type and severity
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Vascular and access-related complications (rate)
Rates by type and severity
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cardiac structural complications (count)
Numbers by severity
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Cardiac structural complications (rate)
Rates by severity
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other acute procedural and technical valve related complications (count)
Numbers by category and type of clinical presentation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Other acute procedural and technical valve related complications (rate)
Rates by category and type of clinical presentation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Conduction disturbances and arrhythmia (count)
Numbers by type, timing and duration
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Conduction disturbances and arrhythmia (rate)
Rates by type, timing and duration
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Acute kidney injury (count)
Numbers by stage
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Acute kidney injury (rate)
Rates by stage
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (count)
Numbers by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (rate)
Rates by type
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Clinically significant valve thrombosis (count)
Numbers by timing period
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Clinically significant valve thrombosis (rate)
Rates by timing period
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient-reported outcomes and health status
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.