Black Americans in the US fare worse across nearly every health indicator compared to White individuals. In Philadelphia, the location of this study, these health disparities culminate in a stark longevity gap, with average life expectancies in poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods being 20 years lower than in nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods. The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a suite of place-based and financial-wellbeing interventions at the community, organization, and individual/household levels that address the social determinants of racial health disparities. At the community level, the investigators address underinvestment in Black neighborhoods by implementing vacant lot greening, abandoned house remediation, tree planting, and trash cleanup. At the organization level, the investigators partner with community-based financial empowerment providers to develop cross-organizational infrastructure to increase reach and maximize efficiency. At the individual/household levels, the investigators increase access to public benefits, financial counseling and tax preparation services, and emergency cash assistance. The investigators will test this "big push" intervention in 60 Black neighborhood microclusters, with a total of 720 adults. The investigators hypothesize that this "big push" intervention will have significant impact on overall health and wellbeing.
Black individuals in the United States fare worse than White individuals across almost every social, economic, and health indicator. The Black health disadvantage starts at birth, reflecting the cumulative toll of racialized social stressors and healthcare discrimination on maternal health and resulting in higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight. Black youth are disproportionately exposed to environmental toxins such as lead and adverse childhood events such as financial hardship and neighborhood violence. Black adults have higher rates of chronic disease, including diabetes, hypertension, as well as many cancers. These and other forces culminate in a stark racial longevity gap: in Philadelphia, the location of this study, life expectancy for people living in a poor, predominantly Black neighborhood is 20 years lower than for people living in a nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhood. The fundamental cause of these striking and pervasive disparities is structural racism - the confluence of deep historical, institutional, cultural, and ideological forces that unequally distribute resources and risks across racialized groups. Structural racism patterns health by affecting a range of interconnected, mutually reinforcing social determinants of health at the national, neighborhood, household, and individual levels. Most notably, longstanding, systematic disinvestment has resulted in highly segregated Black neighborhoods with dilapidated environmental conditions and severe economic insecurity within Black households, leading to a "feedback loop of concentrated racial disadvantage," all of which have been strongly tied to poor health. Most interventions seeking to address racial health disparities focus on individual-level behaviors and outcomes, or individual channels by which structural racism harms health. However, by failing to address upstream social determinants, these interventions have had limited population level impact. A multi-level, multi-component intervention package focused on a range of social determinants of health is necessary to meaningfully address structural racism as a fundamental cause of racial health disparities.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
571
Tax preparation; access to public benefits; financial counseling and microgrants
Vacant lot greening; abandoned house remediation; trash cleanup; and tree planting.
Philadelphia Neighborhoods
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Overall Health Index
Composite index using method of Anderson (2008) based on three questions: rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent); rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse); and number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation); (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
Time frame: 24 months
Psychological Distress
Kessler-6 (answers scored 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological distress)
Time frame: 24 months
Overall health
Rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent) (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
Time frame: 24 months
Poor health
Whether individual reported either poor or fair health to overall health question (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)
Time frame: 24 months
Change in overall health
Rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse)
Time frame: 24 months
Healthy days
Number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation)
Time frame: 24 months
Sleep duration
Number of hours of usual sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
Time frame: 24 months
Short sleep
Less than seven hours of usual night sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
Time frame: 24 months
Healthcare access
Received all needed care in the last 6 months (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)
Time frame: 24 months
Financial well-being
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Abbreviated Financial Well-being Survey
Time frame: 24 months
Food insecurity
Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement Screener
Time frame: 24 months
Income tax filing
Whether or not individual (or someone in household on behalf of individual) filed previous years income tax (yes, planning to file late, no) (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Home ownership
Whether or not individual owns house, condo, or mobile home (Add Health)
Time frame: 24 months
Owing on mortgage
Whether or not individual has remaining mortgage payments (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Total debt
Amount of debt added altogether, not including mortgage (Add Health)
Time frame: 24 months
Participation in public medical benefit programs
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare savings, LIS, CHIP, Qualified Health Plans, SelectPlan, other, or none (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Participation in public food benefit programs
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in SNAP, WIC, Senior Food Box, other, or none (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Participation in public income support or cash benefit programs
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in TANF, LIHEAP, SSI/SSDI, UI, PA General Assistance, PA Emergency Rental Assistance, EITC, CTC Refugee Cash Assistance, CCIS, PA Child Care Tax Credit, other, or none (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Participation in public home ownership benefit programs
Participation of a household member (including respondent) in PTRR, Homestead Exemption, LOOP, Basic Systems Repair Program, PA Homeowner Assistance, Philly First Home Program, Philadelphia Home Repair Assistance, other or none (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Frequency of greenspace engagment
Frequency with which individual visits a greenspace (such as a park, garden, greened vacant lot, trail, or any other outdoor space with vegetation) (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)
Time frame: 24 months
Time spent in greenspace
Time spent in a greenspace on a typical day (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior))
Time frame: 24 months
Reasons for not spending time in greenspace
Things that stop an individual from spending time in greenspace (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)
Time frame: 24 months
Perception of tree cover
Beliefs about number of trees in the neighborhood (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Tree planting concerns
Whether or not individual has concerns about planting more trees in neighborhood (internally developed)
Time frame: 24 months
Perceived tree health benefits
Whether or not individual believes trees confer health benefits (e.g., safety, mental health benefits, physical health benefits, social benefits, environmental benefits, aesthetic benefits)
Time frame: 24 months
Perceived stress
Perceived Stress Scale (responses scored 0-16 with higher scores correlated to higher stress)
Time frame: 24 months
Time spent in neighborhood
Frequency with which individual endorses spending time relaxing, socializing, or hanging out in porches, stoops, and front yards of neighborhoods (adapted from Kahneman et al 2004 Science)
Time frame: 24 months
Neighborhood social capital
Neighborhood Social Cohesion \& Exchange and Social \& Physical Disorder Scale (two domains: Social Cohesion and Physical Disorder. Higher scores for social cohesion indicate higher levels of social cohesion and higher scores for physical disorder indicate higher levels of physical disorder).
Time frame: 24 months
Physical disorder
Whether or not participant reports a lot of abandoned buildings in their neighborhood (Ross and Mirowksi)
Time frame: 24 months
Neighborhood crime rates
Overall number of crimes, number of violent crimes, serious crimes, and gun related incidents
Time frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete
Nuisance calls
Number of 311 calls and number of 311 calls for neighborhood cleanup and remediation-related issues
Time frame: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) after intervention period complete
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.