Hypertension (HTN) is the leading modifiable cause of cardiovascular disease. Rural individuals experience challenges of the rural health divide: geographic distance from providers, social isolation, limited social resources, and high rates of low health literacy. This study evaluates a home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) program that provides longitudinal health education, empathic guidance, monitoring, and adaptable patient-centered coaching to rural individuals. Participants in this study will be randomized to receive (1) HBPM with the intervention; or (2) the control, consisting of HBPM and a smartphone with a general health application (WebMD).
Hypertension (HTN) has increasing prevalence, is the leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and contributes significantly to health care utilization and costs. Social determinants of health (SDOH) exacerbate patients' access to therapies, adherence, and health outcomes. A robust literature demonstrates the effects of income, education, health literacy, and social resources on access to HTN treatment; medication adherence; and short- and long-term likelihood of clinical adversity. In the U.S., geographic obstacles to care further complicate HTN treatment and outcomes for rural individuals. This single-center, parallel group randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluates a home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and cardiovascular mobile health platform in rural individuals with hypertension (HTN). The intervention uses a virtual coaching platform to provide health education, monitoring, guidance, and adaptable patient-centered coaching to rural individuals. The 6-month intervention provides a personalized curriculum to promote HBPM; medication adherence; HTN education; non-pharmacologic strategies for HTN management; preparation for the clinical encounter; and enhanced problem-solving and engagement for rural individuals. The trial is 12-month duration with visits at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Individuals with poorly controlled HTN (systolic BP 140-199 or diastolic BP 90-119 mm Hg at 2 ambulatory visits) will be randomized to: (1) intervention, the HBPM coaching intervention and HBPM; or (2) control, smartphone with a general health application (WebMD) and HBPM. For both intervention and control, summaries of BP measures are provided to clinicians in order to improve HTN management for rural patients. The primary study outcome is improvement in BP from baseline to 6 months. The secondary study outcomes are comparison of adherence to antihypertensive medications and patient-reported outcomes in the intervention and usual care arms at 6 and 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
334
A digital application for providing education and support for home-based blood pressure monitoring.
Smartphone-based application for health education and/or monitoring.
Device for measuring blood pressure at home with blue tooth connectivity for automated collection.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
RECRUITINGChange in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months
Change in home-based systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and usual care arms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Adherence to antihypertensive medications
Adherence to antihypertensive medication from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and usual care arms using Proportion of Days Covered, ranging from 0 to 100%, where higher values indicate superior medication adherence.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Adherence to antihypertensive medications
Adherence to antihypertensive medication from baseline to 12 months between the intervention and usual care arms using Proportion of Days Covered, ranging from 0 to 100%, where higher values indicate superior medication adherence.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patient-reported outcomes between the intervention and usual care arms at 6 months measured with the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) with distinct assessments of the following: (1) physical function, (2) anxiety, (3) depression, (4) fatigue, (5) sleep, (6) ability to participate in social roles, (7) social role satisfaction, and (8) interference in functioning by pain. Each domain is scored separately, such that scores for each domain range from 4 (lowest score) to 20 (highest score), where higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patient-reported outcomes between the intervention and usual care arms at 12 months measured with the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) with distinct assessments of the following: (1) physical function, (2) anxiety, (3) depression, (4) fatigue, (5) sleep, (6) ability to participate in social roles, (7) social role satisfaction, and (8) interference in functioning by pain. Each domain is scored separately, such that scores for each domain range from 4 (lowest score) to 20 (highest score), where higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Self-efficacy for managing medications and treatment
Patient-reported outcomes between the intervention and usual care arms at 6 months measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Self-efficacy for managing medications and treatment, a 10-item instrument, scored from 10 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), where higher scores indicate superior self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Self-efficacy or managing medications and treatment
Patient-reported outcomes between the intervention and usual care arms at 12 months measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Self-efficacy for managing medications and treatment, a 10-item instrument, scored from 10 (minimum) to 40 (maximum), where higher scores indicate superior self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Adherence to home blood pressure monitoring
Quantification of home blood pressure monitoring during the 6-month intervention phase, characterized as both a continuous and categorical measure, compared by study arm.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention phase at 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.