The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
100
Numeric information for prevention of pressure sores thgrough digital tool MEDIASCREEN
Information for prevention of pressure sores in classic way with paper
Pôle Saint-Hélier
Rennes, Brittany Region, France
Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials
The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month
Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool
Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "Not at all satisfied" and 100 : "Completely satisfied". Higher scores better outcome.
Time frame: At 1 month
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem.
Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem.
Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy.
Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness.
Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month
Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools
Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "No knowledge" and 100 : "Perfectly mastered subject". Higher scores better outcome.
Time frame: At 1 month
Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization
Count of the apparition number of pressure sores.
Time frame: At the beginning and at 1 month
Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients
Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points. Higher scores better outcome.
Time frame: At 1 month
Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.
Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3.
Time frame: At 1 month
Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.
Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion.
Time frame: At 1 month
Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure.
The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.
Time frame: At the beggining and at 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.