Comparison of Manual Ventilation and Automatic Mechanical Ventilation during CPR, Pilot \& Feasibility Study (CAVE-I trial)
This is a preliminary randomized clinical trials comparing the effectiveness of the automatic mechanical ventilation method compared to manual ventilation methods commonly performed during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) in emergency room for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Ventilation settings: Mode: (S)Continuous Mandatory Ventilation Rate: 10 b/min. Tidal Volume: 500 ml (male), 450 ml (female) I:E=1:1 Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP): 5 cmH2O Flow trigger: off Oxygen: 100% Alarms: Pressure 70 cmH20, Tidal volume 100 \~ 1,000 ml
Ambu-bagging (It is recommended in the guidelines as a ventilation method.) Methods: 10 times per minutes by medical personnel
Seoul Metropolitan Goverment-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center
Seoul, Korea (the Republic Of), South Korea
ROSC: return of spontaneous circulation
Rate of any ROSC after ACLS
Time frame: Within 20 minutes of ACLS
Arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) parameters
PH (no unit), PO2 in mmHg, PCO2 in mmHg, HCO3 in mEq/L
Time frame: The first test was conducted within 5 minutes of ACLS, and the second test 10 minutes after the first test.
Ventilation parameters
Tidal volume (TV) and Minute volume (MV) during the entire ACLS
Time frame: During the entire ACLS time after randomization and endotracheal intubation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.