Objective: Implant surface topography is a key element in achieving osseointegration. Nanostructured surfaces have shown promising results in accelerating and improving bone healing around dental implants. The main objective of the present clinical study is to compare, at 4 and 6w, bone-to-implant contact in implants having either machined surface (MAC), SLA medium roughness surface or a Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated surface (XPEED®). Thirty five mini-implants with 3 different surface treatments (XPEED® (n=16) - SLA (n=13) - Machined (n=6)), were placed in the posterior maxilla of 11 patients then retrieved at either 4 or 6w in a randomized split-mouth study design.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
11
Implant placement with different surface types
Saint Joseph University
Beirut, Lebanon
Bone to implant contact
Histology technique on specimen retrieved containing mini-implants and bone surrounding it
Time frame: 4 weeks healing period after implant placement
Bone to implant contact
Histology technique on specimen retrieved containing mini-implants and bone surrounding it
Time frame: 6 weeks healing period after implant placement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.