The ICONIC-M study is a multicenter randomized controlled study to assess patient response to CRT comparing ECGI map guided left ventricular lead placement with empirical lead placement. The hypothesis of the investigation is to demonstrate that CRT LV lead implantation guided by a map obtained with the Amycard 01C System and showing LV Latest Electrical Activated Site (LEAS) in combination with a CT cardiac venogram improves CRT outcome. An improved CRT outcome is defined as a ≥30% increase in LVESVi reduction compared to empiric CRT LV lead implantation. The sample size will be 136 in the Control arm and 194 in the Active arm. A total of 330 subjects. The study follows an adaptive design, in where one interim analysis at 70% enrollment will be performed. The sponsor may stop enrollment when either one of the following conditions apply: * Statistical significant difference between groups in the primary endpoint has been reached confirming a difference in reduction of the LVESVi of ≥30% in the Active arm compared to the Control arm * There is no trend or reason to believe statistical significance will be reached with a higher sample size. Statistical significance (primary endpoint) is reached at interim (70%) or at total (100%) of enrollment with a significance value P lower than 0.025.
The study is conducted at European sites as a Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up study of a CE marked device (Amycard 01C). Its aim is to strengthen clinical evidence by assessing whether the use of this device for CRT planning improves clinical outcome in a statistically significant number of patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
330
ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a contrast enhanced CT
ECGi mapping using the CE marked Amycard 01C device and a non-contrast CT
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGGroningen University Medical Center
Groningen, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLeids Universitair Medical Center
Leiden, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMaastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, Netherlands
RECRUITINGUtrecht University Medical Center
Utrecht, Netherlands
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital da Luz
Lisbon, Portugal
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLund University Hospital
Lund, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGKarolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBart's Hospital
London, United Kingdom
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGKing's College
London, United Kingdom
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 1 more locations
Reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi)
Reduction versus baseline of LVESVi as measured by transthoracic echocardiography
Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation
Successfully placed LV leads
Rate of successfully placed LV leads in the control and active arms
Time frame: 6 months post CRT implantation
Correctly predicted distance between latest activation site and LV lead
Rate of correctly predicted distance between the latest electrical activation site, as identified with Amycard 01C, and the LV lead, as identified on CT
Time frame: 6 months post implantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.