Intro: Patients with atrial fibrillation are at significant risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage, which can lead to strokes or systemic embolisms. This risk justifies first-line prescribing of long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in these patients. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure, is an interventional cardiology technique for patients at high risk of stroke related to atrial fibrillation in whom long term anticoagulation therapy cannot be conducted. This procedure involves implantation of an occlusion device into the left atrial appendage to close it and prevent migration of thrombotic material that could otherwise cause distant embolism. Closure of the left atrial appendage avoids long-term prescription of anticoagulants while protecting patients against the risk of systemic embolism and stroke. Hypothesis/Objective: the main objective of this study is to assess the long term efficacy of left atrial closure, 5 years after the procedure Method: 150 patients will be included prospectively. We will also include restropectively100 other patients, previously treated by left atrial appendage closure at Henri Mondor hospital. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomography data will be obtained by physical examination or medical records. Conclusion: this study will allow to assess the long term efficacy of left atrial closure in atrial fibrillation patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
250
Details that can be made public about the intervention
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - CHU HENRI MONDOR
Créteil, France
RECRUITINGFrequency of thrombo-embolic events
The primary efficacy endpoint is the frequency of a combined endpoint including ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms after left atrial appendage closure. This frequency will be expressed as the percentage of patients who presented at least one of these events. Only the first event occurring in each patient will be taken into account, in the case where the same patient would present several events.
Time frame: 60months of follow-up after the procedure
Efficacy of the procedure
: At the end of the procedure, the efficiency of the procedure will be described by the percentage of success of the procedure. The successful procedure is defined by a successful implantation of the device in the left atrial appendage without presaging its occlusive character. One hour after the end of the procedure
Time frame: One hour after the end of the procedure
Occlusion of the left atrial appendage
The percentage of left atrial appendage occlusion is defined as the percentage of patients where left atrial appendage is efficiently closed at by transesophageal echography and / or CT scan Time Frame: 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
residual peri-device leak
The percentage a patients with 3 months residual peri-device leak will be determined at transesophageal echography and / or CT scan
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of ischemic stroke
Percentage of patients with at least one ischemic stroke during the study
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Percentage of transient ischemic attack (TIA)
Percentage of patients presenting at least one systemic embolism during the study
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Percentage of systemic embolism
Percentage of patients presenting at least one systemic embolism during the study
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Cardiovascular or unexplained death
Percentage of patients who had a cardiovascular or unexplained death during the study
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
All-cause mortality
percentage of all cause deaths
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Comparison of the rate of thromboembolic events to expected values
the observed rate of thromboembolic event will be compared to the expected value, according the individual patients CHA2DS2-VASc scores
Time frame: 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Rate of complications related or potentially related to the device or the implantation procedure
: Rate of complications related or potentially related to the device or the implantation procedure
Time frame: periprocedural period (defined as the time from the day of the procedure to day 7 or discharge, whichever comes last)
Percentage of pericardial effusion
Percentage of patients who presented a pericardial effusion objectified by trans-thoracic ultrasound
Time frame: Periprocedural period (defined as the time from the day of the procedure to day 7 or discharge, whichever comes last)
Percentage of pericardial effusion
Percentage of patients who presented a pericardial effusion objectified by trans-thoracic ultrasound
Time frame: 3 months
Percentage of migration of the device
Percentage of patients who presented a migration of the device, objectified by echocardiography and / or CT scan
Time frame: periprocedural period (defined as the time from the day of the procedure to day 7 or discharge, whichever comes last)
Percentage of migration of the device
: Percentage of patients who presented a migration of the device, objectified by the echocardiography and / or CT scan
Time frame: 3 months; 1 year; 5 years
Percentage of device thrombosis
Percentage of patients who presented a thrombosis on the device, objectified by transesophageal echography and / or CT scan
Time frame: 3 months; 1 year; 5 year
Bleeding (all cause)
Percentage of patients who presented a bleeding
Time frame: 1 year; 5 year
Bleedings not-related to the procedure or the device
Percentage of patients who presented a bleeding not-related to the procedure or the device
Time frame: 1 year; 5 year
Criteria for Evaluating Associated Antithrombotic Treatments
The antithrombotic treatments will be collected at different follow-up times. The type and duration of anti-thrombotic treatments will be documented using the combined criteria: * Percentage of patients on injectable or oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents at different follow-up times * Percentage of patients on injectable or oral anticoagulants at different follow-up times * The percentage of patients on platelet antiaggregants in single or dual therapy at different follow-up times
Time frame: : Discharge, 3, 6, 12 months after the procedure, 1 and 5 years after the procedure
Description of the population
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients will be collected and described, such as: age, sex, medical and surgical history, cardiovascular pharmacological treatments, comorbidities, indication of left atrial closure, HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, anatomical features of the left atrial appendage at inclusion.
Time frame: At inclusion
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.