The main purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of LY3819469 in adults with elevated lipoprotein(a). The study will lasts about 20 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
320
Percent Change From Baseline in Time Averaged Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] Over Days 60-180
LPa levels were assessed using Immuno turbidimetric method. Percent change is calculated as: Percent Change=\[(Lp(a) at Time Point-Lp(a) at Baseline)/Lp(a) at Baseline\]×100 Least squares (LS) mean was determined using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with log(Lp(a)) - log(Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as post-baseline measures. Result presented is after back-transformation. Variance-Covariance structure = Unstructured. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 60 - 180
Percent Change From Baseline in Time Averaged Lp(a) Over Days 240-360
LPa levels were assessed using Immuno turbidimetric method. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with log(Lp(a)) - log(Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as post-baseline measures.. Result presented is after back-transformation. Variance-Covariance structure = Unstructured. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 240 - 360
Percentage of Participants Achieving Lp(a) <125 and <75 Nanomole/Liter (Nmol/L) at Days 60, 180
Percentage of Participants Achieving Lp(a) \<125 and \<75 Nanomole/Liter (nmol/L) at Days 60, 180 is reported.
Time frame: Days 60, 180
Percentage of Participants Achieving Lp(a) <125 and <75 Nanomole/Liter (Nmol/L) at Days 240, 360, and 540
Percentage of Participants Achieving Lp(a) \<125 and \<75 Nanomole/Liter (Nmol/L) at Days 240, 360, and 540 is reported.
Time frame: Days 240, 360, and 540
Percent Change From Baseline in Lp(a)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Care Access - 801 South Power Road, Mesa
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Care Access - South Pasadena
Pasadena, California, United States
Care Access - Santa Clarita
Santa Clarita, California, United States
Care Access - Spring Hill
Spring Hill, Florida, United States
Care Access - Pebble Beach Boulevard, Tampa
Sun City, Florida, United States
Care Access - Tamarac
Tamarac, Florida, United States
Care Access - Tampa
Tampa, Florida, United States
Care Access - Lake Charles
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Care Access - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Care Access - Dorchester
Dorchester, Massachusetts, United States
...and 70 more locations
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log (Baseline) + High Risk CV Stratum (yes/no) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as post-baseline measures. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 60, 180, 240, 360, and 540
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB)
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with log (Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Baseline Lp(a) stratum (\<275 nmol/L vs. \>=275 nmol/L) + High Risk CV Stratum (yes/no) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares as post-baseline measures. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 60, 180, 240, 360, and 540
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
hsCRP is a laboratory analyte that is an indicator of inflammation. Decreases in hsCRP represent reductions in inflammation. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with log (Actual Measurement/Baseline) = log(Baseline) + Baseline Lp(a) stratum (\<275 nmol/L vs. \>=275 nmol/L) + High Risk CV Stratum (yes/no) + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares as post-baseline measures. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 60, 180, 240, 360, and 540
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of LY3819469
AUC was computed using the population PK model. Therefore, the concentrations are simulated from time 0 to infinity to estimate AUC for each participant. The timeframe reflects the PK timepoints that were collected to develop the population PK. Although this is a multiple dose study, the plasma PK is very short, so AUC0-180days is equivalent to AUC0-infinity.
Time frame: Day 1: 0.5 hours, 4-9 hours post-dose; Day 180: 24-36 hours post-dose