The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab subcutaneously (s.c.) compared to placebo in adult patients with moderate to severe rotator cuff tendinopathy and failure to conventional therapy.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase IIIb, 24-week study to investigate the superior efficacy of secukinumab and safety in participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Secukinumab 300 mg s.c. was compared to placebo (both arms in combination with patient individualized conventional therapy) in relieving clinical symptoms at Week 24. The study consisted of a screening period up to 6 weeks, a 2-week run-in period, a 12-week treatment period and a 12-week follow-up period. Treatment and follow-up periods were blinded. Participants who met the eligibility criteria at screening continued to the run-in period and were randomized. In the run-in period, participants performed 2 weeks of home-based standardized physiotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
62
Secukinumab 300 mg s.c for 12 weeks in a pre-filled syringe (PFS)
Placebo to match secukinumab s.c. for 12 weeks in a PFS
Novartis Investigative Site
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Percentage Score at Week 24
The WORC Index consisted of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). Each of the 21 items in the WORC was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 100 (worst possible impact). Thus, the total score ranged from 0 to 2100 points. The score was reported as a percentage of normal by subtracting the total score from 2100, dividing by 2100, and multiplying by 100. Total final WORC percentage scores ranged from 0%, the lowest functional status level, to 100%, the highest functional status level. Change from baseline in the WORC percentage total score was assessed at Week 24. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the WORC Percentage Sub-scores at Week 24
The WORC Index consisted of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). Each of the 21 items in the WORC was rated using a VAS ranging from 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 100 (worst possible impact). Each subdomain score was calculated as a percentage of normal function, ranging from 0% (worst condition) to 100% (best condition). Change from baseline in the WORC Index percentage sub-domain score was assessed at Week 24. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Week 24
The participant's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0="no activity" to 100= "most active", after the question " Please indicate with a vertical mark ( \| ) through the horizontal line the global activity of your disease in the last 24 hours". Change from baseline in the participant's global assessment of disease activity score was assessed at Week 24. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Doberan, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottbus, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, Germany
...and 9 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36v2) Score at Week 24
The SF-36 Health Survey was a validated questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life. Participants completed the survey throughout the study, reflecting their health status over the previous 4 weeks. It consisted of eight subscales that were scored individually; and two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were derived from weighted combinations of the eight subscales. Each domain and component summary score ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change from baseline to Week 24 in all subscale and summary scores was assessed, where a positive change indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire Score at Week 24
The QuickDASH was an abbreviated form of the DASH. The QuickDASH Index was self-administered and used 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in participants with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. It had a recall period of 1 week. Each item of the QuickDASH had five response options. The raw score was calculated as the sum of responses, converted to an average, and rescaled to a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) Change from baseline to Week 24 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score at Week 24
The score for pain was assessed by using an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 "no pain at all" to 10 "worst possible pain", after the question "On a numeric scale of 0-10 where would you rate your pain at this time". Change from baseline to Wek 24 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 24- Total Score
The EQ-5D-5L was a standardized instrument used to evaluate patients' overall health-related quality of life (QoL). It consisted of two components: the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system assessed five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension was rated on five levels, from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). These ratings were combined to generate a composite health index, which could be converted into a single summary health utility score using published value sets. Total scores ranged from 0 to 1, with lower scores indicating greater health impairment. Changes in total scores from baseline to Week 24 were analyzed, with positive changes indicating improvement in health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 24- EQ VAS
The EQ-5D-5L was a standardized instrument used to evaluate patients' overall health-related quality of life (QoL). It consisted of two components: the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ VAS captured the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). Changes in EQ VAS scores from baseline to Week 24 were analyzed, with positive changes indicating improvement in health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24