Many different forms of depression exist. It is difficult to predict to what treatment a given patient with depression responds. Studies demonstrate that biomarkers can help to distinguish different forms of depression. Simple markers, like aldosterone/cortisol in body fluids, blood pressure and inflammation markers , have been identified as predictors of therapy resistance in depression. Enoxolone is a molecule derived from the licorice plant and has demonstrated an effect on these biomarkers, which may imply an improved response. The current randomized placebo controlled study is assessing whether the presence of markers of therapy resistance can predict a preferential effect of enoxolone vs. placebo on clinical outcome. Secondarily, it is tested whether these markers change differentially in the treatment groups. Finally, the relationship between the change of the markers and clinical change will be assessed.
The objective of the study is 1. to confirm patient characteristics, which are related to lesser responsivity to antidepressant treatment and 2. to explore the utility of the 11-beta hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase type 2 (11betaHSD2) and toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 inhibitor enoxolone to reverse these markers of refractoriness and, potentially, improve clinical outcome. A broad spectrum of patients is recruited in order to provide the opportunity to compare those with relevant markers of refractoriness vs. those without. The identified markers are related to the activity of aldosterone, which appears to affect specific CNS areas, which are involved in mood and autonomic regulation. One area of particular relevance is the pontine nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). Potential primary triggers for an increased aldosterone release under stressful conditions are related to low blood pressure, electrolyte alterations and a dysfunction of the peripheral mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). The resultant aldosterone release evokes activity at the NTS, which may lead to depression and anxiety. Enoxolone leads to an activation primarily of the peripheral MR by reducing the activity of the 11betaHSD2, therefore allowing cortisol access to the MR and, as a consequence, suppress the release of renin, angiotensin and aldosterone. In addition, it can increase blood pressure slightly. 1. A set of potentially predictive markers for therapy response of enoxolone vs. placebo will be studied, based on this mechanistic pathway, in detail: For the primary analysis subjects are grouped into those with higher vs. lower systolic blood pressure values, as determined by the median systolic blood pressure value at baseline. For the secondary analysis the ratio of urine aldosterone/cortisol, as collected over night will be used as a differentiating parameter. Split at the median defines the groups. Exploratory parameters for a split are the following: 1. sleep duration 2. heart rate variability 3. salt taste sensitivity and salt preference 4. inflammation markers, in particular C-reactive protein in plasma. 5. Optional: volumes of lateral ventricles, corpus callosum and choroid plexi. 6. Optional: white matter integrity, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging 2. Markers of target engagement: 1. Effect of enoxolone vs. placebo on systolic blood pressure. 2. Effect of enoxolone vs. placebo on urine aldosterone/cortisol concentration. 3. Effect of enoxolone vs. placebo on plasma sodium/potassium concentration ratio. 4. Effect of enoxolone on C-reactive protein and other inflammation markers. 3. The relationship between changes in hormone concentrations and markers of CNS activation of MR, i.e. functional CNS target engagement. These are: 1. Heart rate variability and heart rate 2. Systolic blood pressure at rest and nocturnal blood pressure dip 3. Total sleep time 4. Salt taste preference and sensitivity 5. Inflammatory markers 6. Optional: volumes of lateral ventricles, corpus callosum and choroid plexi. 7. Optional: white matter integrity, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
80
one capsule of active or placebo in the evening
Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Marburg, Hesse, Germany
RECRUITINGPlasma and urine aldosterone/cortisol ratio
ratio of plasma aldosterone/cortisol at awakening; ratio of nocturnal urine aldosterone concentration/urine cortisol concentration
Time frame: Baseline, as predictor for differentiation of treatment groups clinical response
C-reactive protein
C-reactive protein in plasma
Time frame: Baseline, as predictor for differentiation of treatment groups clinical response and change from baseline (4 weeks)
Systolic blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure at rest at baseline as a predictor for treatment differentiation
Time frame: Baseline, as predictor for differentiation of treatment groups clinical response
Depression rating
Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) - 17 items; higher is worse
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4, with systolic blood pressure as covariate
Urine aldosterone/cortisol ratio
Ratio of nocturnal urine aldosterone concentration/urine cortisol concentration
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Plasma ratio of sodium/potassium
Ratio of the plasma concentration of sodium/ plasma concentration of potassium
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Nocturnal heart rate variability
Average nocturnal heart rate variability, expressed as stress level (Garmin, arbitrary unit)
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Nocturnal blood pressure dip (difference between pre-sleep and minimal nocturnal blood pressure
Minimum of continuously monitored systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Depression self rating
Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), higher is worse
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Total sleep duration
Total sleep duration, as determined by wearable device (Garmin) (minutes)
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Salt taste preference and sensitivity
salt taste preference, as determined by tasting a 0.9% NaCl solution, 11 item Likert scale (Murck et al., 2018)
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
Rating for symptoms of normal pressure hydrocephalus
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale (iNPHGS) (Kubo et al., 2008), higher is worse
Time frame: change from baseline to week 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.