For millions of cancer survivors, cognitive impairment is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that is associated with other symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety and fatigue), poorer work ability, and poorer quality of life. Available evidence, including work by the investigators own group, suggests that cognitive training may be a viable treatment option. However, to date, these studies are limited as none have been conducted in the home and therefore fail to address the transferability of these empirically based cognitive training programs to general practice. The purpose of this translational research is to conduct a home based single-blind, randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility, satisfaction, and preliminary efficacy of cognitive training compared to attention control in breast cancer survivors (BCS) as well as to explore potential biomarkers of intervention effects. This research innovatively builds on investigator's previous research by: 1) translating findings from the laboratory to the home setting and importantly seeks to identify facilitators and barriers of intervention use; 2) addresses limitations of previous trials (uses an attention control rather than a no-contact or wait-list control), (3) examines cognitive training effects on real-life outcomes such as associated symptoms, perceived work ability and quality of life; and (4) will be the first study in cancer survivors to explore levels of BDNF as a potentially sensitive outcome measure of intervention effects over time compared to attention control. Findings from this study will provide necessary information about the feasibility, satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of the home-based cognitive training on memory performance and processing speed as well as its effects on associated outcomes in BCS. Positive results will lead to a larger, full-scale study to determine efficacy and build evidence-based treatment for clinicians to use in treating BCS with cognitive impairment.
The goal of this translational research study is to determine the feasibility, satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of cognitive training delivered in the home for cancer survivors suffering from cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive impairment. In addition, this will be the first study in cancer to explore levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is now known to be associated with neural plasticity, as a potentially sensitive outcome measure of intervention effects over time compared to attention control. Cancer- and cancer-treatment-related cognitive impairment is a national research priority. Up to 75% of the 2.6 million breast cancer survivors (BCS) living in the United States report problems with memory or feelings of mental slowness. Deficits in memory and processing speed have also been documented on neuropsychological exam and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Cognitive impairment is a prevalent, severe, and persistent problem that is associated with other symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, fatigue), poorer work ability and poorer quality of life. Cognitive training may be a viable treatment option. To date, a total of 8 pilot studies, including the investigator's own randomized controlled trial36 have noted positive effects of cognitive training in cancer survivors. These findings, combined with evidence from studies in the well elderly, suggest that cognitive training interventions to promote neuroplasticity are likely to be beneficial; however, these studies are limited as most have been conducted in the home and therefore, fail to address the transferability of these cognitive training programs to general practice. Therefore, the purpose of this translational research is to conduct a home based single-blind, randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility, satisfaction, and preliminary efficacy of cognitive training delivered in the home setting compared to attention control in breast cancer survivors (BCS). In addition, this will be the first study in cancer to explore levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Specific aims are to: (1) examine the feasibility, acceptability (facilitators and barriers) and satisfaction of the computer-based cognitive training program; (2) test the preliminary efficacy of cognitive training on improving perceived cognitive function (FACT-PCI) over time compared to attention control; (3) test the preliminary efficacy of cognitive training on improving cognitive performance (memory, processing speed, attention, working memory, executive function) over time compared to attention control; Exploratory - (1) evaluate cognitive training effects on associated outcomes (work ability, health perception status and change and quality of life) compared to attention control; and (2) explore the effect of computerized cognitive training on serum brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) over time compared to attention control. BDNF is widely distributed in the brain, plays a crucial role in neuroplasticity and has been observed to correlate with cognitive function in cancer patients. A total of 68 eligible BCS will be randomized to computerized cognitive training or attention control. A blinded and trained tester will perform data collection and neuropsychological testing at two time points: baseline prior to intervention (T1) and immediately after the 10-week cognitive training -program (within 90 days) (T2). Feasibility and satisfaction will be assessed through objective indicators (study adherence, completion rate) and self-report (facilitators, barriers, and perceived satisfaction) and cognitive performance will be assessed through objective neuropsychological tests of memory, processing speed, attention, working memory, executive function assessed over the phone. In addition, the study will measure the effects of cognitive training on self-report measures of perceived cognitive function, associated symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety and fatigue), perceived work ability, and quality of life. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and a general linear mixed model (GLMM). Simple main effects analyses will be used to follow up statistically significant interactions.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
46
The person is asked to clear the rows of blocks presented on the screen, either by moving them into horizontal or vertical blocks that have identical color. The goal is to refine and increase the response of primary visual cortex neurons and to enable the person to increase speed and accuracy of visual processing (executive function) and visual memory.
The user is first presented with a target bird. Subsequently, a group of birds is presented in the peripheral vision and then disappears when the trial begins. The user selects the section of the screen where the target bird appeared. The presentation speed adapts with user performance (i.e. better performance = faster presentation). The goal is to improve speed and accuracy of object identification in peripheral vision and improve visual precision important for improving memory.
The person is first presented objects (jewels) on the screen. The objects are then covered with occluders (bubbles) and then identical distracters are presented. The objects move around in screen and when the movement stops, the user chooses the occluders that cover the jewels. The number of jewels adapts to performance (more jewels = better performance). The goal is to improve divided visual attention, sustained visual attention, visual working memory, and visual precision.
The person is presented a series of target stimuli and distracters which are presented at one time and then disappear. The locations of the stimuli are marked by icons, and the user chooses the icons where the target stimuli were once located. The goal is to increase speed and accuracy as well as the ability to extract information accurately.
The person is presented with a target vehicle briefly in both the center of the screen and in one of eight locations in the periphery. Two vehicles are then presented briefly in the center of the screen, one of which is the target vehicle. The user must identify the location of the target vehicle in the periphery as well as identify which was the target vehicle that appeared in the center. The goal of this activity is to improve divided attention and ability to extract information and discard irrelevant information from peripheral vision.
The program offers a pre-determined set of computerized crossword puzzles. The site has over 100,000 puzzles and can be accessed easily via the web and are free to users. The computerized crossword puzzles do not provide for progressive challenges of increasing speed, visual field size, number of distractors or degree of difficulty of targeted stimulus differentiation.
Indiana University School of Nursing
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Likert-based 8-item questionnaire rating overall satisfaction, quality of training, etc. 4-point scale (range from 8-32) with higher scores indicating greater acceptability and satisfaction.
Time frame: Within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Abilities Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) measured using 8-item, 5-point Likert scales with range from 8-40. The Cognitive Abilities Scale items target positive self-assessments of cognitive functioning with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability. The Cognitive Concerns Scale items are worded negatively and express concerns in the same area with higher scores indicating more cognitive concerns. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Concerns Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) measured using 8-item, 5-point Likert scales with range from 8-40. The Cognitive Abilities Scale items target positive self-assessments of cognitive functioning with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability. The Cognitive Concerns Scale items are worded negatively and express concerns in the same area with higher scores indicating more cognitive concerns. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Work Ability Index (WAI) Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
Work ability was assessed by one item from the WAI. This item assessed current work ability on a Likert scale from 1 (cannot work at all) to 10 (work ability at its best) with higher scores indicating better work ability. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Medical Outcomes Study-Short-Form Health Survey (MOS SF-36) General Perceptions of Health Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
General Health Perception and Quality of life (general mental health) was measured using The MOS-SF-36 with the general perceptions of health status subscale used to measure general health perceptions (5 items), on a 5-point Likert scale (total range of 5-25), with higher scores indicating positive perceptions of general health and general mental health. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Medical Outcomes Study-Short-Form Health Survey (MOS SF-36) Perceived Change in Health Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
General Health Perception and Quality of life (general mental health) was measured using The MOS-SF-36 with the, changes in general health perception (1-item), on a 5-point Likert scale (total range of 1-5), with higher scores indicating positive perceptions of general health and general mental health. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
Change in Medical Outcomes Study-Short-Form Health Survey (MOS SF-36) General Mental Health Between Baseline and 1 Week Post-intervention
General Health Perception and Quality of life (general mental health) was measured using The MOS-SF-36 with the general mental health (5-items), on a 5-point Likert scale (total range of 5-25), with higher scores indicating positive perceptions of general health and general mental health. Outcomes are controlled for the baseline assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and within 1 week post-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.