The goal of this clinical study is to compare the clinical performance of a new 2-steps universal adhesive in patients with non-carious cervical lesions. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there any difference in clinical performance of a new 2-steps universal adhesives bonded with different etching strategies. Participants will have restorations using a new 2-steps universal adhesives in different etching strategies. * etch-and-rinse * selective enamel etching * self-etch
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
55
The universal adhesive can be bonded using 3 different bonding strategies. Therefore, three bonding strategies will be assigned for 3 arms: etch-and-rinse, selective enamel etching, self-etch
Faculty of Dentistry, Manidol University
Bangkok, Thailand
sensitivity (modified USPHS)
tooth sensitivity to hot/cold water, tactile
Time frame: 3 years
retention (modified USPHS)
retention rate of the restoration that retain in the mouth after treatment
Time frame: 3 years
secondary caries (modified USPHS)
caries recurrent rate after restoration
Time frame: 3 years
marginal adaptation (modified USPHS)
the quality of the restoration margin
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.