The purpose of the study is to test and understand acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a mobile educational app specifically customized to patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) receiving therapy with combination immunotherapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
20
The mHealth interactive application consists of educational intervention geared towards eligible patients who are receiving Nivolumab/ Pembro with Axitinib/Cabozantinib/Lenvatinib. These patients commonly experience immune-related side effects, higher rate of fatigue, high blood pressure, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The educational intervention will consist of multiple modules covering relevant information on treatment and adverse events and provided over a six-week period through an mHealth platform. This educational intervention includes a patient-friendly algorithm for early detection and management of the most common adverse events in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving combination immunotherapy.
The eHEALS digital literacy test is an 8-item measure of eHealth literacy developed to measure the participants combined knowledge, comfort and perceived skills at finding, evaluating and applying electronic health information to health problems. The test is measured with a 5-point Likert scale with response options ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Total scores of the eHEALS are summed to range from 8 to 40, with higher scores representing higher self-perceived eHealth literacy.
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Acceptability of Smart Phone Application
Patient's acceptability of the smart phone application for education will be captured in the patient post education survey.
Time frame: at 6 months
Efficacy of Smart Phone Application -Quality of Life
Efficacy of the smart phone application on patient quality of life will be assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30) scores.
Time frame: at 6 months
Efficacy of Smart Phone Application - Patient Knowledge
Efficacy of the smart phone application on patient knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment will be assessed by weekly true/false quizzes.
Time frame: Weekly, beginning at baseline to month 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants will take a weekly true/false quiz to assess knowledge of their diagnosis, expected outcome and treatment associated adverse effects at baseline and longitudinally. Each quiz will be administered at the beginning of the week before the weekly educational content is available, then the same quiz will be administered after the educational content is reviewed by the patient. Each quiz will be scored based on the number of correct answers.
The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30) comprises 30 single questions, 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 is performed according to QLQ-C30 Scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status denote a better level of functioning (i.e. a better state of the patient), while higher scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a higher level of symptoms (i.e. a worse state of the patient).
The Patient Post Intervention Survey is a 7 question survey to help determine the effectiveness of the mHealth app. 3 questions are open fields for patient feedback, and 4 questions ask how often the app was used, how often the educational module was used and if the patient found it useful.