The objective of the SMART trial is to compare a combination therapy using azathioprine and subcutaneous infliximab versus ileocecal resection in patients with symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease.
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, disabling and destructive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leading to progressive and cumulative bowel damage, including fistulas and strictures. Strictures are defined as intestinal luminal narrowing and can lead to obstructive symptoms in the medium-to-long term. Symptomatic strictures significantly impair patient's quality of life by the presence of obstructive symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and dietary restrictions leading to malnutrition. Strictures can appear anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but affect most commonly the terminal ileum. Epidemiological studies indicate that more than 40% of patients with ileal CD will develop strictures. However, treatment strategies are not well-defined in this indication. Most patients undergo surgery but recent observations indicate that a medical treatment by anti-TNF may be considered in stricturing CD. The European Crohn's Colitis Organization recommends that "ileocecal CD with obstructive symptoms, but no significant evidence of active inflammation, should be treated by surgery". However, the lack of inflammation is difficult to demonstrate and does not predict the extent of fibrosis, and inflammation and fibrosis are often associated. Thus, there is a need for better defining therapeutic strategies. The objective of the SMART trial is to compare for the first time medical versus surgical approaches in stricturing CD. Indeed, up to date, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to compare medical treatment alone versus surgery in patients with symptomatic stricturing CD. The hypothesis is that medical treatment by a combination therapy using infliximab and azathioprine is non-inferior to surgical resection in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 1 year, with the advantage of being conservative as regards the high rates of post-operative recurrence with the subsequent risk of small bowel syndrome, as well as highly more acceptable by patients, especially since infliximab is now available as a biosimilar in a subcutaneous formulation, which should also improve the cost-effectiveness of the medical strategy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Combination therapy using 2-2.5 mg/kg oral azathioprine plus subcutaneous infliximab
Ileocolonic or small bowel resection
IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) - related quality of life
Mean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score. The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.
Time frame: 12 months
IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) -related quality of life
Mean total inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ - Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire ) score. The total score ranges from 32 to 224, the higher the score the better the quality of life.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24 months
Endoscopic remission
Proportion of patients achieving endoscopic remission at month 6 (SES-CD \< 2 in case of medical treatment or Rutgeerts score \< i,2 in case of resection)
Time frame: 6 months
Obstructive symptoms
Mean total score of CDOS (CROHN'S DISEASE OBSTRUCTIVE SCORE ) Scale frome 0 to 6. 0 is the best outcome.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Clinical activity
Mean total score of CDAI (CROHN'S DISEASE ACTIVITY INDEX ) Scale from 0 to 1100. 0 is the best outcome.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
inflammatory biomarkers (fecal calprotectin)
Mean values of fecal calprotectin
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
inflammatory biomarkers ( C-reactive protein [CRP])
Mean values of CRP
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
imaging parameters
Proportion of patients with an improvement in wall thickening, contrast enhancement, T2-signal increase, diffusion weighted-signal increase and length of pathological segment at month 12 as compared to screening imaging (MRI) by physician global assessment
Time frame: 12 months
treatment failures
Proportion of patients without any treatment failures
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (disability)
Mean total score of IBD-DI (INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE DISABILITY INDEX ) Score from 0 to 100. 0 is the best outcome (no disability)
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (work productivity)
Mean total score of WPAI (WORK PRODUCTIVITY AND ACTIVITY IMPAIRMENT QUESTIONNAIRE) In percentage from 0 to 100.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (fatigue)
Mean total score of FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy ) scores from 0 to 52, with higher scores corresponding to less fatigue
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (body image)
Mean total score of body image questionnaire Ranges from 0 to 30 and can be calculated by summing up the 10 items. A higher score means a higher level of body image disturbance
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (generic quality-of-life)
Mean total score of SF-36 (QUESTIONNAIRE SHORT FORM 36 HEALTH SURVEY ) Score ranging from 0 to 100. A low score reflects a perception of poor health, loss of function, presence of pain. A high score reflects a perception of good health, absence of functional deficit and pain
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
patient-reported outcomes (anxiety/depression)
Mean total score of HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus allowing two scores (maximum score for each score = 21). Minimum : 0. The best outcome is 0.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Patient's acceptability -patients refusing to be included
Number of screened patients refusing to be included
Time frame: 24 months
patient's acceptability - The reason
The reason for refusing
Time frame: 24 months
intervention-related adverse events
Proportion of patients with intervention (drug or surgery) -related adverse events during the study
Time frame: 24 months
efficiency of medical treatment compared to surgery as assessed by a cost-utility analysis performed from a collective perspective
Incremental cost-utility ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Years, QALYs) from a collective perspective
Time frame: 24 months