Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. The current study will evaluate the influence of body composition on intravenous and subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin G in patients.
Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. Total (TBW), ideal (IBW), and adjusted (AdjBW) body weight-based dosing strategies are suggested, but these recommendations are based on expert opinion rather than high quality evidence. The adoption of a specific strategy is highly variable depending on the clinician and/or institutional setting. Recently, payors have also adopted strategies to reduce IgG therapy costs of by capping doses. These recommendations are often based on the presumption that IgG distribution is limited to the vascular space. While this assertion is logical, it does not account for changes adipose tissue may confer on target sites, nor does it account for the potential for adipose tissue to function serve as a metabolic sink or a source of inflammatory mediators. The later would be especially important in patients receiving SCIG. Several observational studies have evaluated IgG dosing in obese patients and have been the source of support for dosing strategies. Many of these studies were not representative of specific populations, contained a wide variety of patients with different IgG indications, and had inadequate serum sampling. More recently, the phase III randomized controlled PATH trial did not find a correlation with serum IgG concentrations and clinical endpoints. However, it is important to note that the study was not designed to evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints. There is also considerable interpatient variation in response; therefore, identification of patient characteristics that predict response or IgG change from baseline will be a useful tool to improve patient responses. Our study will evaluate the influence of body composition and other patient characteristics may have on IgG exposure when given intravenously or subcutaneously.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Intravenous immune globulin G dosed based on the subjects's current dose received for the treatment of CIDP.
Subcutaneous immune globulin G converted from the subject's current IVIG dose 1:1.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Clinical Research Center
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
RECRUITINGAssessment of drug half-life
Calculation of drug half-life based on data obtained from serum samples
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after intravenous immune globulin G administration
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit
Time frame: Just before drug administration, immediately after drug administration, approximately days 7 and 14 post drug administration
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after subcutaneous immune globulin G administration
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit
Time frame: Just before drug administration, immediately after drug administration, approximately days 2, 4 and 7 post drug administration
Assessment of grip strength
Grip strength will be measured using the handheld Martin Vigorimeter just before each dose of IgG is administered during the study period. Subjects will be asked to squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible with each of his or her hands in a standing position.
Time frame: Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Assessment of muscle function
The Medical Research Council (MRC) system for testing and grading of muscle function aims to provide a standardized and objective way to assess muscle function. It was originally introduced in 1943 and has a long history of use in neurology, rehabilitation and general medicine examinations. Assessments of muscles are done bilaterally, meaning that for each muscle tested, the same muscle on the opposite side of the body is also tested. The MRC sum score is finally calculated by adding the score of each individually assessed muscle. The MRC score ranges from 0 - 30 with 0 as the worst outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Assessment of patient disability
The Rasch Overall Disability scale (I-RODS) and the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Sensory (INCAT) sum score disability scale will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The I-RODS score can range from 0 to 48 with 0 representing the greatest disability. The INCAT score ranges from 0 - 10 with 10 representing worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Assessment of fatigue
Fatigue is a common patient concern in CIDP and the Rasch-built fatigue severity scale (R-FSS) will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The R-FSS ranges from 9 to 63 with 63 being the worst score
Time frame: Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.