FAST and PSFS: Assessment and Validation of Two Functional Scales in Patients With Knee OA in Singapore

Overview

The new National One-Rehab framework mandates the use of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) as an outcome measure to track patients' rehabilitation progress. Anecdotally, we have encountered patients (especially elderly ≥ 65 years old) with difficulty understanding and completing such questionnaire accurately. We developed a pictorial functional scale (Functional Activity Scoring Tool, FAST) with reference to the successful application of the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale. Concurrently, we hope to validate PSFS and FAST against Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which is validated in Singapore population. This study aims to investigate the reliability and validity of the PSFS and FAST in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We hypothesize that both the PSFS and FAST can be used to measure difficulty in performing activities of daily living in patients with knee osteoarthritis in a reliable and valid manner. The FAST and PSFS questionnaires will be administered to patients in SingHealth Polyclinics with knee osteoarthritis to explore the psychometric and clinimetric properties. Eligibility criteria were: age 45 and above, proficient in English, diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. Patients were excluded if they have underlying medical or trauma conditions (i.e., trauma, fracture, infection, inflammatory disease, tumor), history of knee surgery within the last 3 months, or clinically recognizable cognitive impairment. Eligible patients will be informed about the purpose of the study and the confidentiality and anonymity of the process. After giving written consent they will complete a questionnaire on demographic and clinical characteristics and the sets of outcome measures (FAST, KOOS, PSFS). Participants will then return at two-to-three weeks later to complete the sets of outcome measures again and GROC, and to state their preferred outcome measures. Statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of PSFS and FAST against KOOS.

Validation The FAST and PSFS questionnaires will be administered to patients in SingHealth Polyclinics (SHP) with knee osteoarthritis to explore the psychometric and clinimetric properties. Eligibility criteria were: age 45 and above, proficient in English, diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. Patients were excluded if they have underlying medical or trauma conditions (i.e., trauma, fracture, infection, inflammatory disease, tumor), history of knee surgery within the last 3 months, or clinically recognizable cognitive impairment. Statistical analysis will be conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of PSFS and FAST against KOOS. Questionnaire 1. FAST FAST is developed by Mr. Tang Zhi Yin and Mr. Ng Khim Siong from SHP physiotherapy department. It is a pictorial scale with 7 emotion faces (different degrees of sadness to happiness) on stairs to depict corresponding level of difficulty a patient is experiencing during performing activity. Short descriptions are labelled under the faces, as well as a scale of 0-10 to guide the patient to rate his/her functional difficulty. The patient is asked to identify up to 3 activities that being affected due to his/her current musculoskeletal pain, and to rate each activity on the FAST. 2. PSFS The PSFS is a self-reported, patient-specific measure that assesses patients' functional status. Patients are asked to identify three activities that are most affected by their condition and then rate their ability on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is unable to perform activity and 10 is able to perform activity at the same level as before the onset of symptoms. 3. KOOS The KOOS is a knee-specific instrument, developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. It is a validated tool in Singapore for knee osteoarthritis patients. It has a total of 42 items in 5 subscales i.e., pain, other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life. Scores are interpreted independently for each subscale. As our study focuses on function, we only apply subscales for function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life. 4. GROC The GROC is an outcome measure that assesses patients' self-perception of change in their condition between sessions. Participants were asked to rate the change in their condition on a 15-point transitional scale from -7 (a very great deal worse) to 7 (a very great deal better). The GROC scale is easy to administer, requires minimal skills or training, has good reproducibility, and is sensitive to change. Data collection Eligible patients will be informed for the purpose of the study and the confidentiality and anonymity of the process. After giving written consent they will complete a questionnaire on demographic and clinical characteristics and the sets of outcome measures (FAST, KOOS, PSFS). Participants will then return at two-to-three weeks later to complete the sets of outcome measures again and GROC, and to state their preferred outcome measures. Statistical analysis All statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS 26 for Windows. To investigate validity, the discriminant validity was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient according to the following criteria: high (rho ≥ 0.60); moderate (rho \< 0.60 - ≥ 0.30); or low (rho \<0.30). To analyze the test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is calculated. An ICC value of less than 0.40 indicated poor reliability, whereas values between 0.40 and 0.75 indicated fair to good reliability; an ICC value of greater than 0.75 showed excellent reliability.