Utility and Usability of ActivSight™ Laser Speckle Imaging in Visualization of Tissue Perfusion and Blood Flow During Esophageal Surgery in Humans

Activ Surgical70 enrolled

Overview

ActivSight™ combines an innovative form factor and proprietary software to deliver precise, objective, real-time visualization of blood flow and tissue perfusion intraoperatively for laparoscope-based surgery. A small adaptor that fits between any existing laparoscope and camera systems and a separate light source placed along any current commercial system will deliver objective real-time tissue perfusion and blood flow information intraoperatively. Primary Objective: To determine the feasibility of ActivSight™ in detecting and displaying tissue perfusion and blood flow in the conduit and foregut anastomoses in esophageal resection/reconstructive surgery. The investigators will compare the precision and accuracy among the naked eye inspection, ICG and LSCI in assessing the vascularity of the conduit.

Design: * This is a prospective interventional cross-over study where ActivSight™ will be used in sequence to the standard practice of visualizing perfusion status of the conduit using the naked eye visual inspection and ICG during esophageal resection. * Feasibility will be determined by technically successful completion of intended visualization. * Safety will be determined through clinical assessments and evaluation of any adverse event. * Assessment of preliminary efficacy will be performed through analysis of any intraoperative decisions made based on visual display as compared to standard endoscopic approach, or non-inferiority to ICG-based visualization and usability. * Patient outcome and follow up to Postoperative day 28 will be monitored for clinical outcome. * Target enrollment for the assessment of esophageal anastomoses is a total of seventy patients powered to detect \~ 2-3 cm discordance between ICG and LSCI lines of demarcation between well vascularized and less vascularized sites in the gastric conduit. Since ActivSight™ can detect the difference of \> 2 cm between perfused versus less perfused in comparison to ICG with 80 % confidence at p\<0.05 in a sample size of n = 21, the investigators estimate that the study will require an accrual of 63 patients. With potential unforeseen dropout and mortality, the investigators will recruit a total of 70 patients for the proposed study.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

INCLUSION CRITERIA All patients age \> 18 years old undergoing laparoscopic esophageal resection and reconstruction surgery; spoken command and literacy in the native language spoken at each participating center; ability to understand and follow study procedures; and having provided signed consent. Diagnosis: * All patients with a clinical suspicion and diagnosis of benign or malignant, small or large bowel lesions requiring surgical resection. * Typical imaging as per standard workup findings including US, CT and/or MRI. Plain radiographs and contrast imaging may be obtained by referring physicians and are helpful for confirming the clinical diagnosis. Location of pathology or resected segment: \* Target lesions can be located in any fore-, mid- or hindgut segments requiring reconstruction and anastomoses. Prior therapy: \* Patients with prior surgery are eligible for enrollment. Laboratory: * Hemoglobin \> 9 g/dL * Platelet count ≥75,000/µL (may receive transfusions) * Normal PT, PTT and INR \< 1.5 x ULN (including patients on prophylactic anticoagulation) * Renal function: Age-adjusted normal serum creatinine derived from Schwartz formula for estimating GFR by the CDC OR a creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for safe * Adequate pulmonary function: Defined as no dyspnea at rest, and a pulse oximetry \>94% on room air if there is clinical indication for determination. EXCLUSION CRITERIA * There is no exclusion criteria for ActivSightTM for esophageal surgery. * Patients assigned to FDA cleared ICG-based visualization are contraindicated for any chronic renal dysfunction, potential drug interaction, history of allergy to ICG or anaphylaxis, known allergy to iodides, breast-feeding or being of reproductive age with pregnancy possible and not ruled out, and pregnancy. * Patients currently in any investigational agents.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Incidence of Adverse Events in 28 days following use of ActivSight™

To determine safety of ActivSight™ in patients undergoing esophageal surgery, as defined through clinical assessments and evaluation of use related adverse events intraoperatively and a routine follow up at 28 days following surgery. ActivSight™ will be deemed safe if no hardware (adaptor or light source)-related major (serious) adverse event is encountered in the treated patients and if less than 2 hardware-related minor adverse events are encountered. Adverse events will be summarized descriptively and tabulations on the type, severity, and relationship to application will be performed and any changes of outcomes from baseline on follow up will be examined using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank test.

Time frame: 28 days

Preparation time of ActivSight™.

Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = Difficult to use or Unsatisfied - 5 = no training required or very satisfied): How easy was ActivSight to set up?

Time frame: 1 day

Latency of display of ActivSight™.

Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = Difficult to use or Unsatisfied - 5 = no training required or very satisfied): How specifically did ActivSight display the intended field and the target tissue of interest?

Time frame: 1 day

Resolution and objectivity of display of ActivSight™.

Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = Difficult to use or Unsatisfied - 5 = no training required or very satisfied): How was the display quality of ActivSight on the intended field and target tissue of interest?

Time frame: 1 day

Specificity of display of ActivSight™.

Specificity of display will serve as an outcome for feasibility. Yes/No question for surgeon: "Does the perfusion information displayed by ActivSightTM reflect the expected pattern of blood flow interruption?"

Time frame: 1 day

Usability of ActivSightTM by surgeon, as quantified by Likert scale.

Likert scale ratings will serve as an outcome for feasibility. Scale 1-5 question (1=strongly disagree, 2=slightly disagree, 3=neutral, 4=slightly agree, 5=strongly agree): "ActivSightTM was easy to use while operating."

Time frame: 1 day

Support personnel satisfaction with ActivSightTM, as quantified by Likert scale.

Time frame: 1 day

User feedback on utility of relative perfusion unit display versus color heatmap

Likert scale ratings will serve as an outcome for feasibility. Scale 1-5 question (1=strongly disagree, 2=slightly disagree, 3=neutral, 4=slightly agree, 5=strongly agree):

Time frame: 1 day

Episodes of intraoperative decision change based on display

Yes/No if surgeons changed intraoperative planning/decisions based on ActivSight™, with additional details (what did they change and why) requested if yes.

Time frame: 1 day

Usability of the device by surgeon and support personnel satisfaction;

Likert scale ratings will serve as an outcome for feasibility. Scale 1-5 question (1=strongly disagree, 2=slightly disagree, 3=neutral, 4=slightly agree, 5=strongly agree):

Time frame: 1 day

Secondary Outcomes

Ability of ActivSightTM to display perfusion.

ActivSightTM ability to display perfusion at a tissue level during gastrointestinal anastomoses is measured by the following Yes/No question for the surgeon: "Does ActivSightTM display tissue perfusion of the anatomy during anastomoses in comparison to ICG?"

Time frame: 1 day

Ability of ActivSightTM to display blood vessels.

ActivSightTM ability to display blood vessels during gastrointestinal anastomoses is measured by the following Yes/No question for the surgeon: "Does ActivSightTM display vascularity of the anatomy during anastomoses in comparison to ICG?"

Time frame: 1 day

Utility and Usability of ActivSight™ Laser Speckle Imaging in Visualization of Tissue Perfusion and Blood Flow During Esophageal Surgery in Humans

Overview

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (2)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

Central Contacts