Advanced stages of the response to life-threatening infection, severe trauma, or other physiological insults often lead to exhaustion of the homeostatic mechanisms that sustain normal blood pressure and oxygenation. These syndromic presentations often meet the diagnostic criteria of sepsis and/or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the two most common syndromes encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although critical illness syndromes, such as sepsis and ARDS, have separate clinical definitions, they often overlap clinically and share several common injury mechanisms. Moreover, there are no specific therapies for critically ill patients, and as a consequence, approximately 1 in 4 patients admitted to the ICU will not survive. The purpose of this observational study is to identify early patient biologic factors that are present at the time of ICU admission that will help diagnose critical illness syndromes earlier, identify who could benefit most from specific therapies, and enable the discovery of new treatments for syndromes such as sepsis and ARDS.
Background: Critical illness syndromes, such as sepsis and ARDS, are associated with tremendous heterogeneity in patient predisposing risk factors, mechanisms of acute insult contributing to infection, presenting symptoms, response to therapies, as well as short and long-term outcomes. Since the first standardization of sepsis and ARDS definitions \>30 years ago, significant insight into biological mechanisms contributing to critical illness syndromes have been made. However, there are many important unanswered questions that prevent accurate diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients who present to the ICU with early symptoms consistent with critical illness. Of the many gaps about the biology of sepsis and ARDS that remain unanswered, the following are particularly important: (1) what constitutes immune system dysregulation; (2) how the immune system response depends on interaction with the infecting pathogens; (3) what biologic traits distinguish other diagnoses that mimic these syndromes; (4) what are the mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms in patient outcomes. To address these questions and to improve our understanding of these complex and heterogenous syndromes, a multifaceted and collaborative approach is needed. This study will investigate the biology of early sepsis in critically ill patients by developing a longitudinal prospective observational cohort called Early Severe illness TrAnslational BioLogy InformaticS in Humans (ESTABLISH). Specific objectives: Objective 1: To study biologic mechanisms of immune system regulation during early critical illness. The main questions that will be addressed include: (1) how immune function at the time of admission and over the course of the ICU stay is related to clinical complications; (2) how anatomic compartmentalization of immune responses is associated with clinical complications; (3) how immune responses in different anatomic locations contribute to endothelial cell injury; (4) how macrophages contribute to distal organ injury and long-term clinical complications. Objective 2: To characterize the host-pathogen interaction during early critical illness. The main question that will be addressed include: (1) how the microbial composition at the time of ICU admission affects the immune response; (2) how the change in host-pathogen interactions over time influence clinical complications. Objective 3: To identify biologic traits that distinguish patients with early sepsis and ARDS from other critically ill patients. The main questions that will be addressed include: (1) are biological trains unique to sepsis and/or ARDS, or are they shared by other clinical diagnoses that mimic these syndromes?; (2) can accurately prognosticate clinically important short and long-term patient outcomes?; (3) are biologic traits associated with differential responses to therapies? Objective 4: To study the molecular mechanisms of genetic polymorphisms associated with critical illness using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from polymorphonuclear cells (PBMCs) from critically ill patients. The main questions that will be addressed include: (1) how do autologous iPSC-derived cell lineages interact with autologous plasma?; (2) how do iPSC-derived cell lineages respond to treatment with drugs related to genetic polymorphisms function?; (3) how do iPSC-derived lineages respond to treatment with drugs commonly used in the ICU? Methods: The ESTABLISH cohort will enroll patients within 48 hours of ICU admission who presented to the emergency department within 72 hours of ICU admission. Patients will be enrolled with deferred consent to enable the earliest possible collection of biological specimen. The biological specimen will include anticoagulated blood, a PAX gene tube, and a bronchioalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) sample (in mechanically ventilated patients, when bronchoscopy is clinically indicated) collected at the time of ICU admission (Day 0), and on 4 subsequent timepoints during the ICU admission (Days 1,3,7,14,21). Data generated during ESTABLISH will be analyzed in batches on an ongoing, regular basis and will be objective-specific. Batch sample preparation and data analysis will minimize biological assay and methodological heterogeneity. Objective 1 and 2 data will be analyzed after enrollment of the first 50 patients, and every 50 patients after this. Objective 3 data will be analyzed after enrollment of the first 200 patients and every 200 patients after this.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Collection of 10mL of heparin anticoagulated blood, 10mL of EDTA anticoagulated blood, and 3mL of blood in a PAX gene tube
Bronchioalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples will be obtained from participants who are mechanically ventilated, and a bronchoscopy is indicated as part of routine clinical care. The BALF will be collected by a qualified ICU physician using standard clinical practice. Briefly, patients will receive appropriate sedation and analgesia, a flexible video-bronchoscope will be inserted into the patient's airway, and bronchial segments will be identified. The bronchoscope will be wedged in the most appropriate lung segment and 40-100mL of sterile normal saline (NS) as clinically indicated, will be injected into the bronchoscope port with using a 50mL syringe. Next, the instilled NS (i.e.: lavage fluid) will be collected in a sterile container using gentle suction. The BALF will then be partitioned and sent to clinical laboratories, and the remaining BALF (10-20mL) will be used in the ESTABLISH research study.
Tracheal Aspirate (TA) will be obtained from participants who have an endotracheal tube or a tracheostomy in situ at the time of ICU admission through out the ICU admission on the study days, as long as distal airway access is available.
A Rectal will be obtained at the time of ICU admission and on all study days during the ICU admission
Aleks Leligdowicz
London, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGRisk of developing nosocomial infections during ICU admission
Development of any of the following: Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, Central Line Infections, Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea, Blood stream infections
Time frame: Assessed daily until discharge from ICU, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Severity of illness measured by APACHE score
APACHE
Time frame: At the time of ICU admission
Severity of illness measured by SOFA score
SOFA
Time frame: At the time of ICU admission
Severity of illness measured by MODS score
MODS
Time frame: At the time of ICU admission
Change in severity of illness measured by APACHE score
APACHE
Time frame: From the time of ICU admission, assessed daily until death or discharge from ICU, up to 12 months
Change in severity of illness measured by SOFA score
SOFA
Time frame: From the time of ICU admission, assessed daily until death or discharge from ICU, up to 12 months
Change in severity of illness measured by MODS score
MODS
Time frame: From the time of ICU admission, assessed daily until death or discharge from ICU, up to 12 months
Hospital disposition
Survival, death
Time frame: Determined at the time of discharge from the hospital, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Neurocognitive dysfunction
Cambridge Brain Sciences (CBS) web-based neurocognitive battery
Time frame: 1, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge
Physiological outcomes
Ultrasound-identified volume responsiveness
Time frame: 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after ICU admission
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.