Chronic neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. It is highly prevalent, debilitating, and challenging to treat. Current available treatments have low efficacy, high side effect burden, and are prone to misuse and dependence. Emerging evidence suggests that the transition from acute to chronic neuropathic pain is associated with reorganization of central brain circuits involved in pain processing. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising alternative treatment that uses focused magnetic pulses to non-invasively modulate brain activity, a strategy that can potentially circumvent the adverse effects of available treatments for pain. RTMS is FDA-approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and migraine, and has been shown to reduce pain scores when applied to the contralateral motor cortex (M1). However, available studies of rTMS for chronic neuropathic pain typically show variable and often short-lived benefits, and many aspects of optimal treatment remain unknown, including ideal rTMS stimulation parameters, duration of treatment, and relationship to the underlying pain etiology. Here the investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of high frequency rTMS to M1, the region with most evidence of benefit in chronic neuropathic pain, and to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify alternative rTMS targets for participants that do not respond to stimulation at M1. The central aim is to evaluate the pain relieving efficacy of multi-session high-frequency M1 TMS for pain. In secondary exploratory analyses, the investigator propose to investigate patient characteristic that are predictive of responsive to M1 rTMS and identify viable alternative stimulation targets in non-responders to M1 rTMS.
The investigators will recruit 20 patients diagnosed with chronic neuropathic pain for a randomized, single-blind, 2-arm crossover pilot TMS treatment trial. Participants will be recruited outpatients from departments of neurosurgery, neurology, and pain medicine at UCSF; patients referred from other hospitals or clinics as candidates of this trial. Baseline screening, clinical interviews, behavioral testing, and recording of pain scores will be performed in either the UCSF Nancy Friend Pritzker Psychiatry Building, UCSF Pain Management Center, or UCSF Mount Zion Hospital prior to the first treatment session. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of two stimulation frequencies: high frequency (10Hz) excitatory vs low frequency (1Hz) inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). We will use clinical and research TMS devices that have been cleared by the FDA for treating obsessive compulsive disorder and refractory major depressive disorder (located in the Pritzker Building) through a collaboration with Dr. Andrew Krystal (Director of UCSF Interventional Psychiatry Program and Co-Director of the TMS \& Neuromodulation Clinic) and Dr. Moses Lee (Director of OCD clinic) at UCSF. Randomized patients will return for once daily rTMS sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays. On the first randomization visit, participants will record their current pain level using a visual analog scale (VAS), complete a variety of self-report scales (e.g., NIH PROMIS questionnaires, pain map, McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)), and undergo a brain MRI session consisting of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion tensor anatomical scans as well as functional MRI (fMRI) scans at rest and while rating spontaneous pain. Using single-pulse TMS, the investigators will estimate individual resting motor thresholds (RMT) of the affected extremity. Each treatment visit will consist of either: a series of thirty 10-Hz stimulations to the target brain regions at 90% RMT (each lasting 10 s with 50 s between stimulations, for a total of 3,000 pulses per visit) or thirty 1-Hz stimulations to the target brain regions at 90% RMT (total of 300 pulses per visit). Each treatment session will last \~30 min. Electromyography (EMG), heart rate and galvanic skin conductance will be recorded continuously throughout each session. After completing the first 10 sessions, participants will have the option to receive additional stimulation with at either the same region or at a new target region, determined by each subject's baseline MRI scan, at the same frequency with the same schedule as the first session of treatment. Non-responders (\<35% improvement of VAS scores) and those with relapse post-treatment to within 35% pre-treatment baseline pain severity will cross over to the new target arm. Participants will be followed for 6-months to evaluate the duration of benefit with follow up assessments at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
32
Stimulation provided at 10 Hz over target brain regions in thirty trains consisting of 10 seconds of stimulation alternating with 50 seconds of rest (3,000 pulses/session)
Stimulation provided at 1 Hz over target brain regions in thirty trains consisting of 10 seconds of stimulation alternating with 50 seconds of rest (300 pulses/session)
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
RECRUITINGChange in Pain Intensity Over 2 weeks
Change in visual analog scores (VAS) of pain intensity on 0-100 mm scale. 0 indicates no pain, 100 indicates most pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Change in Pain Intensity Over 6 months
Change in visual analog scores (VAS) of pain intensity on 0-100 mm scale. 0 indicates no pain, 100 indicates most pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Pain Unpleasantness Over 2 weeks
Change in visual analog scores (VAS) of pain unpleasantness on 0-100 mm scale. 0 indicates not bothersome at all, 100 indicates most bothersome pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Change in Pain Unpleasantness Over 6 months
Change in visual analog scores (VAS) of pain unpleasantness on 0-100 mm scale. 0 indicates not bothersome at all, 100 indicates most bothersome pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Percent Responders
Proportion of patients in each group with \>50% reduction in pain intensity VAS
Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Percent Responders
Proportion of patients in each group with \>50% reduction in pain intensity VAS
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in medication use
Change in daily as-needed medication use from baseline, in number of doses per day.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks
Change in medication use
Change in daily as-needed medication use from baseline, in number of doses per day.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain scores
The McGill Pain Questionnaire is a validated measure of multiple domains of pain processing, including sensory and affective pain processing as well as nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Scores range from 0-45 with 0 indicating low pain and 45 indicating high pain.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Scores
Validated measure of clinical depression symptoms to quantify and track mood over time. Scores index depression severity and range from 0-63: 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.