In order to offer a new product improving the healing and/or rehabilitation of injuries or injuries to the wrist and hand, Médicus is seeking to develop a new orthosis for the wrist and hand by 3D printing. This project will focus on the development of an orthosis related to carpal tunnel syndrome as well as droopy hand. Among the issues to be addressed in this development proposal, the investigators find: 1) Identification of the best methodology for taking digital impressions; design of an orthosis with the following characteristics: (i) no external attachment system, (ii) spiral design with a thumb ring, (iii) manufacturing by 3D printing and (iv) a cost of less than $150 ;3) Performing technical and clinical trials.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Custom 3D printed thumb and wrist orthosis
TOPMED
Québec, Quebec, Canada
RECRUITINGChange in pain during treatment from baseline at day 14
Pain measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain). Change = (Day 14 score - baseline score)
Time frame: Baseline and day 14
Difficulty in donning the orthosis
Yes/No question about having difficulty putting on the orthosis. No unit.
Time frame: Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Comfort
Comfort measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible comfort) to 5 (best possible comfort). No unit.
Time frame: Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Weight satisfaction rating at baseline
Weight satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of donning
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of donning, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of donning
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of donning, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
Satisfaction on ease of doffing
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of doffing, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of doffing
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of doffing, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
Functional disability evaluation of the upper member
Evaluation of disability of arm, shoulder and hand in activities of daily living via Quick Disability of arm, shoulder and hand (Quick DASH) (validated 11 elements 5-point rating). Possible scores range from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Incapacity to complete task). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
Functional disability evaluation of the upper member
Evaluation of disability of arm, shoulder and hand in activities of daily living via Quick Disability of arm, shoulder and hand (Quick DASH) (validated 11 elements 5-point rating). Possible scores range from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Incapacity to complete task). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
Weight satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Weight satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
aesthetic satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Aesthetic satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
aesthetic satisfaction rating at baseline
Aesthetic satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
material quality satisfaction rating at baseline
Material quality satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Baseline
material quality satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Material quality satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Time frame: Day 14 of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.